Skip to content

Conversation

legendecas
Copy link
Member

napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@legendecas legendecas added test Issues and PRs related to the tests. node-api Issues and PRs related to the Node-API. labels Apr 19, 2020
@legendecas legendecas force-pushed the napi_callback_scope branch from 202e30d to 14deca7 Compare April 19, 2020 11:27
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@legendecas legendecas requested a review from mhdawson April 21, 2020 02:16
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

Landed in 307c67b

@addaleax addaleax closed this Apr 27, 2020
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@legendecas legendecas deleted the napi_callback_scope branch April 28, 2020 02:10
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Apr 28, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2020
napi_async_context should be an opaque type and not be used as same as
node::async_context.

PR-URL: #32928
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

node-api Issues and PRs related to the Node-API. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants