-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34k
feat(esm): expose User-Agent header
#43852
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Fyko
wants to merge
5
commits into
nodejs:main
Choose a base branch
from
Fyko:feat/esm-ua
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev
Previous commit
test: finally fix tests
The issue was that on L133, the headers object being passed through was overwriting the user-agent header. I've reformatted the `opts` spread so the only way to over-write the header is to explicitily define it
- Loading branch information
commit dc621647d0ec4d0d8e4bc36165674d09dd27fc55
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm -1 on always setting this. It should be optional and default turned off.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do other server-side runtimes behave?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My inspiration for this was how Deno sets the User-Agent header when getting packages. I don't quite understand why so many people are against this -- many very popular packages and utilities do this. Curl sets a header. So does node-fetch. List goes on. And it's completely nonsensical to use some type of env var to set the header.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
“many people do x” isn’t ever a justification; many people do many ill-advised things.
The advantages i can see of setting it by default is easier debugging on the other end - the disadvantages i see is that a server could identify, track, and treat differently a request coming from node vs from other sources.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If most non-browser clients set a
User-Agentheader, then it’s a de facto standard and we should do the same. It doesn’t matter if some of us disagree with the wisdom of the practice; the point of adding APIs likefetchis to be more standards-compliant and similar to other clients. If users want network requests withoutUser-Agent, they can just override the default or use some other API.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Understanding the concerns about default behavior is essential. While many popular utilities set the User-Agent header by default, there are legitimate concerns regarding potential server-side differentiation based on this header. However, aligning with common practices across other clients could indeed enhance standards compliance.
Perhaps we can consider an optional flag for users to toggle the inclusion of the User-Agent header, offering both flexibility and adherence to commonly accepted practices. This could cater to different user preferences without compromising on standards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please god not yet another flag. But yes some way to customize this behavior would be good.