Skip to content

Conversation

@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl commented Dec 11, 2025

Hi all,

please review this removal of dead code in ConstantPool::klass_at_impl. The first is about the local inline_type_signature that is never written to after initialization, and the default value just disables some code, the other is an else if condition that is subsumed by the previous if.

Testing: local compilation,:hotspot_valhalla does not show additional failures

Thanks,
Thomas


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Issue

  • JDK-8373510: [lworld] Remove dead code in ConstantPool::klass_at_impl() (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1788/head:pull/1788
$ git checkout pull/1788

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1788
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1788/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1788

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1788

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1788.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Hi all,

  please review this removal of dead code in `ConstantPool::...`.

Testing: local compilation, gha

Thanks,
  Thomas
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 11, 2025

👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lworld will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8373510: [lworld] Remove dead code in ConstantPool::klass_at_impl()

Reviewed-by: fparain

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the lworld branch:

  • c670652: 8373506: [lworld] Disable currently unsupported builds in GHA
  • cf0c0c0: 8373442: [lworld] Fix CDS heap dumping crashes
  • 40958cc: 8373284: [lworld] More tests could be rewritten with LayoutKindHelper

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the lworld branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@fparain) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8373510 8373510: [lworld] Remove dead code in ConstantPool::klass_at_impl() Dec 11, 2025
@tschatzl tschatzl marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2025 09:32
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 12, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Collaborator

@fparain fparain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.
Thank you.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants