Skip to content

Isotopic Abundances: IUPAC 2009, 2013 #2423

@yrrepy

Description

@yrrepy

Hello,

I believe the approach adopted for natural isotopic abundance in Data.py in the link below was incorrect.
#785

That is, selecting column 6 of IUPAC 2013 when an interval is present in column 9.
Column 6 gives you a number that is considered an outstanding measurement for a particular material. But is not necessarily representative of what will be encountered terrestrially for any given element. I guess ideally this would be some sort of mode or median.

I believe a better approach would be either:

  1. revert to IUPAC 2009 and use it's column 9
  2. continue with IUPAC 2013 but when an interval is present in column 9, use the average (mean) over the interval.

I suppose as another alternative, we could make this file (approach) user selectable.

Below, is the approach adopted elsewhere.


1. IUPAC 2009 column 9 (D2=0.0115% of H)


2. IUPAC 2013 column 9, w/Interval mean (D2=0.0145% of H)


I have not seen any source that uses IUPAC 2013 column 6 (D2=0.0156% of H)
Please see attached my correspondence with the primary author of IUPAC 2013, which doesn't really give any specific recommendations (they would probably prefer that we all used some sort of interval, I presume).
RE_ IUPAC Isotopic Compositions Column 9.zip

IUPAC Technical Reports/References

IUPAC 2009:
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1351/PAC-REP-10-06-02/pdf
IUPAC-2009.pdf

IUPAC 2013:
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2015-0503/pdf
IUPAC-2013.pdf

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions