Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Mar 26, 2020

Still not fixed in 4.3.z, rhbz#1817040.

This was referenced Mar 26, 2020
@LalatenduMohanty
Copy link
Member

The general agreement is that we need this before going to fast channel. But for candidate we want to keep the edge in the hope that we will get more useful data.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Apr 1, 2020

/lgtm
4.3.9 erratum are in push

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2020
@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Apr 1, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eparis, sdodson, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 1, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5dc6ebc into openshift:master Apr 1, 2020
@wking wking deleted the block-4.3.9-edges branch April 7, 2020 18:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants