Skip to content

Conversation

@mdbooth
Copy link

@mdbooth mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

We can't push v1beta2 IPAM to production clusters without also running the conversion webhook, so we pin to the last released version which did not have it.

TPNU clusters continue to get the latest CAPI.

Pull in manifests-gen from openshift/cluster-capi-operator#425

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6698, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to target either version "4.21." or "openshift-4.21.", but it targets "4.13.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Closed (Done) instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

  • Revert changes to IPAM CRD manifests
  • DNM: Fucking vendoring
  • Tooling to build IPAM CRD manifests from 4.20
  • Build IPAM CRDs from 4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from chrischdi and damdo December 9, 2025 12:09
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mdbooth

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 9, 2025
@mdbooth mdbooth changed the title OCPBUGS-6698: Pin IPAM CRDs to release-4.20 OCPBUGS-66948: Pin IPAM CRDs to release-4.20 Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66948, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

  • Revert changes to IPAM CRD manifests
  • DNM: Fucking vendoring
  • Tooling to build IPAM CRD manifests from 4.20
  • Build IPAM CRDs from 4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@mdbooth
Copy link
Author

mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66948, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@mdbooth
Copy link
Author

mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66948, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@mdbooth mdbooth marked this pull request as draft December 9, 2025 12:16
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 9, 2025
@mdbooth
Copy link
Author

mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-vsphere-static-ovn

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@mdbooth: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-vsphere-static-ovn

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/0b0cdbf0-d4fa-11f0-81d7-e2152966c00b-0

@mdbooth
Copy link
Author

mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

/test e2e-vsphere-capi-techpreview

@mdbooth
Copy link
Author

mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

/test e2e-aws-capi-techpreview

@mdbooth
Copy link
Author

mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

/test e2e-vsphere-capi-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-capi-techpreview

@mdbooth mdbooth marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2025 15:47
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mdbooth: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66948, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
Details

In response to this:

We can't push v1beta2 IPAM to production clusters without also running the conversion webhook, so we pin to the last released version which did not have it.

TPNU clusters continue to get the latest CAPI.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

We can't push v1beta2 IPAM to production clusters without also running
the conversion webhook, so we pin to the last released version which did
not have it.

TPNU clusters continue to get the latest CAPI.
@mdbooth
Copy link
Author

mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

/cherry-pick release-4.21

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mdbooth: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.21 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@mdbooth
Copy link
Author

mdbooth commented Dec 9, 2025

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-vsphere-static-ovn

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@mdbooth: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.21-e2e-vsphere-static-ovn

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/5ec29bc0-d51f-11f0-8868-0d46b3cdbe8f-0

.PHONY: update-ipam-ref
update-ipam-ref:
# Get the current HEAD of the release-4.20 branch
$(eval current_head := $(shell git ls-remote https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api release-4.20 | awk '$$2 == "refs/heads/release-4.20" {print $$1}'))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't feel like it's going to age well, or is the intention for this not to age well?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we can ever go beyond 4.20 without a radically new approach. We're really hoping that radically new approach is going to be the CAPI Operator 😅 At that point we don't need any of this.


# Instructs CVO to only install these resources in clusters with the Default
# featureset. Specifically this means that they will not be installed in
# (TechPreview|Custom|Dev)NoUpgrade clusters.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# (TechPreview|Custom|Dev)NoUpgrade clusters.
# (TechPreview|Custom|DevPreview)NoUpgrade clusters.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@mdbooth: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Dec 9, 2025

/hold

For question from @JoelSpeed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 9, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link

/hold cancel

We are pinning this until we have a way to deploy the v1beta1 and v1beta2 versions alongside each other, with conversion webhook, in a Default feature set cluster

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 10, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Dec 10, 2025

/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

To fix a Vsphere MAO/CAPI IPAM regression bug that is considered release blocking

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label Dec 10, 2025
@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Dec 10, 2025

@sunzhaohua2 manually verified and informed us here that 4.20 upgrade to 4.21 image built with this PR n.253 succeeds

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Dec 10, 2025

Also the installation of vsphere clusters with staticip via IPAM is successful again with the changes in this PR as confirmed by ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-staticip-ipam-ovn

@damdo
Copy link
Member

damdo commented Dec 10, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@damdo: This PR has been marked as verified by @sunzhaohua2 via [manual upgrade](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api/pull/253#issuecomment-3636937696) and [presubmit vsphere static ip job passing](https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api/pull/253#issuecomment-3636941901)..

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @sunzhaohua2 via manual upgrade and presubmit vsphere static ip job passing.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 65eb451 into openshift:master Dec 10, 2025
18 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@mdbooth: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66948
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66948 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

We can't push v1beta2 IPAM to production clusters without also running the conversion webhook, so we pin to the last released version which did not have it.

TPNU clusters continue to get the latest CAPI.

Pull in manifests-gen from openshift/cluster-capi-operator#425

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@mdbooth: Failed to get PR patch from GitHub. This PR will need to be manually cherrypicked.

Error messagestatus code 406 not one of [200], body: {"message":"Sorry, the diff exceeded the maximum number of files (300). Consider using 'List pull requests files' API or locally cloning the repository instead.","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","field":"diff","code":"too_large"}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#list-pull-requests-files","status":"406"}
Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.21

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

Fix included in accepted release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2025-12-10-193741

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants