Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Nov 15, 2019

The bracketed openshift/docs is from 881dbb7 (#2). But a link makes it easy for folks to see where changes should go, and is something that can be updated by enhancements to link specific PRs as they check off this box.

The bracketed openshift/docs is from 881dbb7 (Add initial
enhancement templates, 2019-08-23, openshift#2).  But a link makes it easy for
folks to see where changes should go, and is something that can be
updated by enhancements to link specific PRs as they check off this
box.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 15, 2019
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Nov 15, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 15, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 15, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 19d5bc0 into openshift:master Nov 15, 2019
@wking wking deleted the openshift-docs-link branch November 18, 2019 05:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants