Skip to content

Conversation

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry pick of: #1450

bump Kubelet reservations

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1801829, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1800319 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1801824 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1801826 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is NEW instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.1] Bug 1801829: kubelet: add more kube reservation to protect node

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 11, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rphillips
To complete the pull request process, please assign runcom
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @runcom in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rphillips: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade 0c50cc4 link /test e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 0c50cc4 link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice requested review from kikisdeliveryservice and sjenning and removed request for LorbusChris and cgwalters February 11, 2020 18:22
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Contributor

@rphillips could you change that second commit to regenerate test files or something clearer?

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 14, 2020
@rphillips rphillips closed this Feb 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants