-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 422
OCPBUGS-7780: pkg/cli/admin/upgrade/channel: Use PATCH instead of POST for spec updates #1346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7780, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
32792c3 to
bbb6f7b
Compare
…ates Like 123fa58 (pkg/cli/admin/upgrade: Use PATCH instead of POST for spec updates, 2022-04-14, openshift#1111), but for the 'channel' subcommand. 123fa58 described the general risk of using POST/Update when the local 'oc' client may not be aware of some new spec properties. For the 'channel' subcommand specifically, it was added in 4.9: $ git ls-tree -r origin/release-4.8 -- pkg/cli/admin/upgrade 100644 blob 578fa80 pkg/cli/admin/upgrade/OWNERS 100644 blob e2418c1 pkg/cli/admin/upgrade/upgrade.go 100644 blob 581af58 pkg/cli/admin/upgrade/upgrade_test.go $ git ls-tree -r origin/release-4.9 -- pkg/cli/admin/upgrade 100644 blob 578fa80 pkg/cli/admin/upgrade/OWNERS 100644 blob b427176 pkg/cli/admin/upgrade/channel/channel.go 100644 blob 2bbf9da pkg/cli/admin/upgrade/upgrade.go 100644 blob 581af58 pkg/cli/admin/upgrade/upgrade_test.go And between 4.9 and the present, ClusterVersion spec grew the 'capabilities' property: $ git diff origin/release-4.9..origin/master -- vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/types_cluster_version.go | grep -v // | grep -A10 Spec @@ -45,8 +45,17 @@ type ClusterVersionSpec struct { @@ -68,6 +77,12 @@ type ClusterVersionSpec struct { Channel string `json:"channel,omitempty"` + Capabilities *ClusterVersionCapabilitiesSpec `json:"capabilities,omitempty"` + @@ -113,6 +128,9 @@ type ClusterVersionStatus struct { ... That property landed in 4.11: $ git --no-pager grep -c ClusterVersionCapabilitiesSpec origin/release-4.10 vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/types_cluster_version.go ...no hits... $ git --no-pager grep -c ClusterVersionCapabilitiesSpec origin/release-4.11 vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/types_cluster_version.go origin/release-4.11:vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/types_cluster_version.go:3 So I suspect 4.9 and 4.10 oc calls to 'oc adm upgrade channel ...' for 4.11+ clusters would clear spec.capabilities. Not all that many clusters try to restrict capabilities, but folks will need to bump their channel for at least every other minor (if their using EUS channels), and while we recommend folks use an oc from the 4.y they're heading towards, we don't have anything in place to enforce that.
|
@wking: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
LalatenduMohanty
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: LalatenduMohanty, wking The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@wking: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7780 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/cherrypick release-4.12 |
|
@wking: new pull request created: #1354 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Like 123fa58 (#1111), but for the
channelsubcommand. 123fa58 described the general risk of using POST/Update when the localocclient may not be aware of some new spec properties. For thechannelsubcommand specifically, it was added in 4.9:And between 4.9 and the present, ClusterVersion
specgrew thecapabilitiesproperty:That property landed in 4.11:
So I suspect 4.9 and 4.10
occalls tooc adm upgrade channel ...for 4.11+ clusters would clearspec.capabilities. Not all that many clusters try to restrict capabilities, but folks will need to bump their channel for at least every other minor (if their using EUS channels), and while we recommend folks use anocfrom the 4.y they're heading towards, we don't have anything in place to enforce that.