Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #24611

/assign rphillips

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1808429, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.2.z" release, but it targets "4.3.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1806786 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1806786 to target the "4.3.z" release, but it targets "4.4.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] [release-4.3] Bug 1808429: UPSTREAM: 88251: Partially fix incorrect configuration of kubepods.slice unit by kubelet

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 4, 2020
@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle [release-4.2] Bug 1810136: UPSTREAM: 88251: Partially fix incorrect configuration of kubepods.slice unit by kubelet

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.2] [release-4.3] Bug 1808429: UPSTREAM: 88251: Partially fix incorrect configuration of kubepods.slice unit by kubelet [release-4.2] Bug 1810136: UPSTREAM: 88251: Partially fix incorrect configuration of kubepods.slice unit by kubelet Mar 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810136, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1806786 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1808429 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1806786 to target the "4.3.z" release, but it targets "4.4.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1810136: UPSTREAM: 88251: Partially fix incorrect configuration of kubepods.slice unit by kubelet

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

sjenning commented Mar 4, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, sjenning

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 4, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810136, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1806786 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1808429 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1806786 to target the "4.3.z" release, but it targets "4.4.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810136, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1808429 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810136, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (NOTABUG) instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1808429 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810136, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1808429 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810136, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1808429 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 28, 2020
@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810136, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1808429 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 30, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1810136, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.2.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.2.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1808429 is in the state CLOSED (ERRATA), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1808429 targets the "4.3.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.3.0, 4.3.z
  • bug has dependents
Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 30, 2020
@mfojtik mfojtik added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jun 4, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bf8cb33 into openshift:release-4.2 Jun 4, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/origin#24631. Bugzilla bug 1810136 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1810136: UPSTREAM: 88251: Partially fix incorrect configuration of kubepods.slice unit by kubelet

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants