Skip to content

Conversation

@raju-opti
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • getFeatureVariable currently return unknown. Updated the return type to more specific type.

Test plan

  • all existing tests should pass

Issues

  • FSSDK-9897

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 28, 2023

Coverage Status

coverage: 90.402%. remained the same
when pulling c8b515e on raju/variable-type
into 2b40193 on master.

Copy link
Contributor

@mikechu-optimizely mikechu-optimizely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few comments 👇

Copy link
Contributor

@mikechu-optimizely mikechu-optimizely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm still in favor of having some unit tests cover the FeatureVariableValue type as return values for getFeatureVariable().

I'll leave that decision to you but Approved.

@raju-opti raju-opti merged commit 7e03647 into master Jan 2, 2024
@raju-opti raju-opti deleted the raju/variable-type branch January 2, 2024 06:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants