tcp_buffer_tuner: reduce tcp_[rw]mem max when correlated with latency… #134
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… increase this restores original behaviour where as long as a correlation is observed we reduce max value. The previous approach of just pausing increases just meant we went straight back to increasing after resetting correlation value and collecting a few values, which is definitely wrong. Reported-by: Bernd Zeimetz <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
oracle-contributor-agreement
bot
added
the
OCA Verified
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
… increase
this restores original behaviour where as long as a correlation is observed we reduce max value.
The previous approach of just pausing increases just meant we went straight back to increasing after resetting correlation value and collecting a few values, which is definitely wrong.
Reported-by: Bernd Zeimetz [email protected]