Skip to content

Conversation

@tomusdrw
Copy link
Contributor

Related #607

@tomusdrw tomusdrw requested a review from Xanewok January 19, 2021 21:51
Copy link
Contributor

@niklasad1 niklasad1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@Xanewok Xanewok left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks! Do we want to address #605 as well before cutting the new release?

@tomusdrw
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good, thanks! Do we want to address #605 as well before cutting the new release?

@Xanewok your call. IMHO better to do it separately, and see if we run into any regressions without soketto, perhaps #605 could be implemented without an API change so it would be transparent to the users.

@Xanewok
Copy link
Contributor

Xanewok commented Jan 20, 2021

@tomusdrw Makes sense, let's do that separately. Deploy away! 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants