-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
Remove deprecated code from bridge-runtime-common #1983
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
svyatonik
merged 12 commits into
master
from
remove-deprecated-code-from-bridge-runtime-common
Mar 23, 2023
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a371acc
removed FromBridgedChainMessageDispatch in favor of XcmBlobMessageDis…
svyatonik fb41d4c
use HaulBlobExporter/HaulBlobExporterAdapter instead of XcmBridge/Xcm…
svyatonik 760ca33
tests for sending/dispatching messages
svyatonik c57bd59
use new schema in testnet bridges + some cleanup
svyatonik 2c541ba
clippy
svyatonik 606de41
spelling + added TODO
svyatonik c7febd8
cleanup some checks
svyatonik 72fe6c4
benchmarks compilation
svyatonik db8a737
all is XCM
svyatonik 24d052d
Merge branch 'master' into remove-deprecated-code-from-bridge-runtime…
svyatonik 252f216
updated README.md
svyatonik 9c2a51e
ref issue from TODO
svyatonik File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next
Next commit
removed FromBridgedChainMessageDispatch in favor of XcmBlobMessageDis…
…patch
- Loading branch information
commit a371accae1fa940718fafdb92944f6b496b1d02d
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bkontur I've copypasted this
XcmRouterWeigherfrom RBH/WBH code. I think we'll be using it for all bridge hubs, right? Could you please check my big comment below - am I right there?Right now the biggest problem here is that it only returns the
ref_timecomponent and theproof_sizeis set to zero. Which is obviously wrong. I see two options to fix it:proof_sizeand return it here. Pros: easy and fast. Cons: inaccurate + we need some mechanism to verify that it is still actual (if something changes in queue implementation);XcmRouterWeigherat all and add some benchmarks to the runtimes, which will measure the actual weight of thequeue.push()(for us it'll be thesend_fragmentin thecumulus-pallet-xcmp-queue).WDYT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Submitted #1986 to track this