Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 11, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@joao-paulo-parity
Copy link
Contributor

I struggled to explain what handle_dependents_after_merge does on a meeting with @koenw so, inspired by the documentation effort at #362, this PR thoroughly comments it (not that explaining what it does makes the process less inherently complicated...). While I was commenting on what happens I detected one missing scenario of dangling references (which don't happen very often, but it's still relevant to recognize it), thus this PR takes that into account with a proposed fix.

thoroughly comment handle_dependents_after_merge
@joao-paulo-parity joao-paulo-parity requested a review from koenw March 9, 2022 11:23
@joao-paulo-parity joao-paulo-parity merged commit 2fa9aef into paritytech:master Mar 17, 2022
@joao-paulo-parity joao-paulo-parity deleted the fix branch March 17, 2022 10:44
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant