Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@coriolinus
Copy link
Contributor

i.e.
Revert "Revert "Remove Old Service, 2nd try (#1732)" (#1758)"

This reverts commit c80f7b6.

Closes #1757. The substance of the code changes has already been reviewed
in #1732 and #1630.

We now have some evidence that the polkadot validator was producing
blocks after all; the reason the blocks_constructed metric was 0 was
that as a new metric it hadn't yet been incorporated into that
branch's codebase. See
#1757 (comment)

As this PR is based on a newer master branch than the previous one,
that should hopefully no longer be an issue.

i.e.
Revert "Revert "Remove Old Service, 2nd try (#1732)" (#1758)"

This reverts commit c80f7b6.

Closes #1757.

We now have some evidence that the polkadot validator was producing
blocks after all; the reason the blocks_constructed metric was 0 was
that as a new metric it hadn't yet been incorporated into that
branch's codebase. See
#1757 (comment)

As this PR is based on a newer `master` branch than the previous one,
that should hopefully no longer be an issue.
@coriolinus coriolinus added A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. A1-needsburnin labels Oct 2, 2020
@coriolinus coriolinus self-assigned this Oct 2, 2020
@coriolinus coriolinus marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2020 08:16
@github-actions github-actions bot added A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. and removed A3-in_progress Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage. labels Oct 2, 2020
@coriolinus coriolinus requested a review from bkchr October 2, 2020 08:17
Copy link
Member

@bkchr bkchr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not checked everything for a third time, I skimmed the changes, while assuming that you did not changed anything ;)

@ordian
Copy link

ordian commented Oct 5, 2020

Needs merge with master.

coriolinus and others added 2 commits October 6, 2020 15:46
…vice-3

Note that it was necessary to make polkadot_runtime_parachains::paras::Origin
public, for macro-related reasons which don't seem to make a lot of sense to me.
I can only assume that this ultimately derives from a Substrate update.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

polkadot_proposer_block_constructed_count not incrementing in branch prgn-remove-old-service-second-try

5 participants