Update dispute participation on active leaves update

node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/initialized.rs

@@ -269,8 +269,13 @@ impl Initialized {
 		update: ActiveLeavesUpdate,
 		now: u64,
 	) -> Result<()> {
-		let on_chain_votes =
+		let scraped_updates =
 			self.scraper.process_active_leaves_update(ctx.sender(), &update).await?;
+		log_error(
+			self.participation
+				.bump_to_priority_for_candidates(ctx, &scraped_updates.included_receipts)
+				.await,
+		)?;
 		self.participation.process_active_leaves_update(ctx, &update).await?;
 
 		if let Some(new_leaf) = update.activated {
@@ -308,7 +313,7 @@ impl Initialized {
 
 			// The `runtime-api` subsystem has an internal queue which serializes the execution,
 			// so there is no point in running these in parallel.
-			for votes in on_chain_votes {
+			for votes in scraped_updates.on_chain_votes {
 				let _ = self.process_on_chain_votes(ctx, overlay_db, votes, now).await.map_err(
 					|error| {
 						gum::warn!(
@@ -416,6 +421,8 @@ impl Initialized {
 				})
 				.collect();
 
+			// Importantly, handling import statements for backing votes also
+			// clears spam slots for any newly backed candidates
 			let import_result = self
 				.handle_import_statements(
 					ctx,
@@ -830,8 +837,15 @@ impl Initialized {
 		let new_state = import_result.new_state();
 
 		let is_included = self.scraper.is_candidate_included(&candidate_hash);
-
-		let potential_spam = !is_included && !new_state.is_confirmed() && !new_state.has_own_vote();
+		let is_backed = self.scraper.is_candidate_backed(&candidate_hash);
+		let has_own_vote = new_state.has_own_vote();
+		let is_disputed = new_state.is_disputed();
+		let has_controlled_indices = !env.controlled_indices().is_empty();
+		let is_confirmed = new_state.is_confirmed();
+		let potential_spam =
+			!is_included && !is_backed && !new_state.is_confirmed() && !new_state.has_own_vote();
+		// We participate only in disputes which are included, backed or confirmed
+		let allow_participation = is_included || is_backed || is_confirmed;
 
 		gum::trace!(
 			target: LOG_TARGET,
@@ -844,8 +858,11 @@ impl Initialized {
 			"Is spam?"
 		);
 
+		// This check is responsible for all clearing of spam slots. It runs
+		// whenever a vote is imported from on or off chain, and decrements
+		// slots whenever a candidate is newly backed, confirmed, or has our
+		// own vote.
 		if !potential_spam {
-			// Former spammers have not been spammers after all:
 			self.spam_slots.clear(&(session, candidate_hash));
 
 		// Potential spam:
@@ -873,14 +890,6 @@ impl Initialized {
 			}
 		}
 
-		let has_own_vote = new_state.has_own_vote();
-		let is_disputed = new_state.is_disputed();
-		let has_controlled_indices = !env.controlled_indices().is_empty();
-		let is_backed = self.scraper.is_candidate_backed(&candidate_hash);
-		let is_confirmed = new_state.is_confirmed();
-		// We participate only in disputes which are included, backed or confirmed
-		let allow_participation = is_included || is_backed || is_confirmed;
-
 		// Participate in dispute if we did not cast a vote before and actually have keys to cast a
 		// local vote. Disputes should fall in one of the categories below, otherwise we will refrain
 		// from participation:

node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/participation/mod.rs

@@ -51,7 +51,10 @@ pub use queues::{ParticipationPriority, ParticipationRequest, QueueError};
 /// This should be a relatively low value, while we might have a speedup once we fetched the data,
 /// due to multi-core architectures, but the fetching itself can not be improved by parallel
 /// requests. This means that higher numbers make it harder for a single dispute to resolve fast.
+#[cfg(not(test))]
 const MAX_PARALLEL_PARTICIPATIONS: usize = 3;
+#[cfg(test)]
+pub(crate) const MAX_PARALLEL_PARTICIPATIONS: usize = 1;
 
 /// Keep track of disputes we need to participate in.
 ///
@@ -212,6 +215,19 @@ impl Participation {
 		Ok(())
 	}
 
+	/// Moving any request concerning the given candidates from best-effort to
+	/// priority, ignoring any candidates that don't have any queued participation requests.
+	pub async fn bump_to_priority_for_candidates<Context>(
+		&mut self,
+		ctx: &mut Context,
+		included_receipts: &Vec<CandidateReceipt>,
+	) -> Result<()> {
+		for receipt in included_receipts {
+			self.queue.prioritize_if_present(ctx.sender(), receipt).await?;
+		}
+		Ok(())
+	}
+
 	/// Dequeue until `MAX_PARALLEL_PARTICIPATIONS` is reached.
 	async fn dequeue_until_capacity<Context>(
 		&mut self,

node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/participation/queues/mod.rs

@@ -159,6 +159,31 @@ impl Queues {
 		self.pop_best_effort().map(|d| d.1)
 	}
 
+	/// Reprioritizes any participation requests pertaining to the
+	/// passed candidates from best effort to priority.
+	pub async fn prioritize_if_present(
+		&mut self,
+		sender: &mut impl overseer::DisputeCoordinatorSenderTrait,
+		receipt: &CandidateReceipt,
+	) -> Result<()> {
+		let comparator = CandidateComparator::new(sender, receipt).await?;
+		self.prioritize_with_comparator(comparator)?;
+		Ok(())
+	}
+
+	fn prioritize_with_comparator(
+		&mut self,
+		comparator: CandidateComparator,
+	) -> std::result::Result<(), QueueError> {
+		if self.priority.len() >= PRIORITY_QUEUE_SIZE {
+			return Err(QueueError::PriorityFull)
+		}
+		if let Some(request) = self.best_effort.remove(&comparator) {
+			self.priority.insert(comparator, request);
+		}
+		Ok(())
+	}
+
 	fn queue_with_comparator(
 		&mut self,
 		comparator: CandidateComparator,

node/core/dispute-coordinator/src/scraping/mod.rs

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ use polkadot_node_subsystem::{
 };
 use polkadot_node_subsystem_util::runtime::{get_candidate_events, get_on_chain_votes};
 use polkadot_primitives::v2::{
-	BlockNumber, CandidateEvent, CandidateHash, Hash, ScrapedOnChainVotes,
+	BlockNumber, CandidateEvent, CandidateHash, CandidateReceipt, Hash, ScrapedOnChainVotes,
 };
 
 use crate::{
@@ -51,6 +51,24 @@ const LRU_OBSERVED_BLOCKS_CAPACITY: NonZeroUsize = match NonZeroUsize::new(20) {
 	None => panic!("Observed blocks cache size must be non-zero"),
 };
 
+/// ScrapedUpdates
+///
+/// Updates to on_chain_votes and included receipts for new active leaf and its unprocessed
+/// ancestors.
+///
+/// on_chain_votes: New votes as seen on chain
+/// included_receipts: Newly included parachain block candidate receipts as seen on chain
+pub struct ScrapedUpdates {
+	pub on_chain_votes: Vec<ScrapedOnChainVotes>,
+	pub included_receipts: Vec<CandidateReceipt>,
+}
+
+impl ScrapedUpdates {
+	pub fn new() -> Self {
+		Self { on_chain_votes: Vec::new(), included_receipts: Vec::new() }
+	}
+}
+
 /// Chain scraper
 ///
 /// Scrapes unfinalized chain in order to collect information from blocks.
@@ -104,8 +122,8 @@ impl ChainScraper {
 		};
 		let update =
 			ActiveLeavesUpdate { activated: Some(initial_head), deactivated: Default::default() };
-		let votes = s.process_active_leaves_update(sender, &update).await?;
-		Ok((s, votes))
+		let updates = s.process_active_leaves_update(sender, &update).await?;
+		Ok((s, updates.on_chain_votes))
 	}
 
 	/// Check whether we have seen a candidate included on any chain.
@@ -122,18 +140,19 @@ impl ChainScraper {
 	///
 	/// and updates current heads, so we can query candidates for all non finalized blocks.
 	///
-	/// Returns: On chain vote for the leaf and any ancestors we might not yet have seen.
+	/// Returns: On chain votes and included candidate receipts for the leaf and any
+	/// ancestors we might not yet have seen.
 	pub async fn process_active_leaves_update<Sender>(
 		&mut self,
 		sender: &mut Sender,
 		update: &ActiveLeavesUpdate,
-	) -> Result<Vec<ScrapedOnChainVotes>>
+	) -> Result<ScrapedUpdates>
 	where
 		Sender: overseer::DisputeCoordinatorSenderTrait,
 	{
 		let activated = match update.activated.as_ref() {
 			Some(activated) => activated,
-			None => return Ok(Vec::new()),
+			None => return Ok(ScrapedUpdates::new()),
 		};
 
 		// Fetch ancestry up to last finalized block.
@@ -147,20 +166,22 @@ impl ChainScraper {
 
 		let block_hashes = std::iter::once(activated.hash).chain(ancestors);
 
-		let mut on_chain_votes = Vec::new();
+		let mut scraped_updates = ScrapedUpdates::new();
 		for (block_number, block_hash) in block_numbers.zip(block_hashes) {
 			gum::trace!(?block_number, ?block_hash, "In ancestor processing.");
 
-			self.process_candidate_events(sender, block_number, block_hash).await?;
+			let receipts_for_block =
+				self.process_candidate_events(sender, block_number, block_hash).await?;
+			scraped_updates.included_receipts.extend(receipts_for_block);
 
 			if let Some(votes) = get_on_chain_votes(sender, block_hash).await? {
-				on_chain_votes.push(votes);
+				scraped_updates.on_chain_votes.push(votes);
 			}
 		}
 
 		self.last_observed_blocks.put(activated.hash, ());
 
-		Ok(on_chain_votes)
+		Ok(scraped_updates)
 	}
 
 	/// Prune finalized candidates.
@@ -187,17 +208,21 @@ impl ChainScraper {
 	/// Process candidate events of a block.
 	///
 	/// Keep track of all included and backed candidates.
+	///
+	/// Returns freshly included candidate receipts
 	async fn process_candidate_events<Sender>(
 		&mut self,
 		sender: &mut Sender,
 		block_number: BlockNumber,
 		block_hash: Hash,
-	) -> Result<()>
+	) -> Result<Vec<CandidateReceipt>>
 	where
 		Sender: overseer::DisputeCoordinatorSenderTrait,
 	{
+		let events = get_candidate_events(sender, block_hash).await?;
+		let mut included_receipts: Vec<CandidateReceipt> = Vec::new();
 		// Get included and backed events:
-		for ev in get_candidate_events(sender, block_hash).await? {
+		for ev in events {
 			match ev {
 				CandidateEvent::CandidateIncluded(receipt, _, _, _) => {
 					let candidate_hash = receipt.hash();
@@ -208,6 +233,7 @@ impl ChainScraper {
 						"Processing included event"
 					);
 					self.included_candidates.insert(block_number, candidate_hash);
+					included_receipts.push(receipt);
 				},
 				CandidateEvent::CandidateBacked(receipt, _, _, _) => {
 					let candidate_hash = receipt.hash();
@@ -224,7 +250,7 @@ impl ChainScraper {
 				},
 			}
 		}
-		Ok(())
+		Ok(included_receipts)
 	}
 
 	/// Returns ancestors of `head` in the descending order, stopping