Skip to content

investigate molecular function #26

Description

@schaferw

From: Pier Luigi Buttigieg notifications@github.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 12:36 PM
To: OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io OBOFoundry.github.io@noreply.github.com
Cc: Schafer, Wes A wes_schafer@merck.com; Author author@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io] Advice on use of terms from orphaned REX ontology (Issue #2002)

EXTERNAL EMAIL– Use caution with any links or file attachments.
What's the status of PROCO? This branch looks concerning, with functions and states under processes.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Message ID: <OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io/issues/2002/1209613106@github.com

From: Jim Balhoff notifications@github.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 12:43 PM
To: OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io OBOFoundry.github.io@noreply.github.com
Cc: Schafer, Wes A wes_schafer@merck.com; Author author@noreply.github.com
Subject: Re: [OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io] Advice on use of terms from orphaned REX ontology (Issue #2002)

EXTERNAL EMAIL– Use caution with any links or file attachments.
What's the status of PROCO? This branch looks concerning, with functions and states under processes.
If you mean GO 'molecular_function', it is supposed to be under 'process'.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions