Skip to content

Conversation

gballet
Copy link
Collaborator

@gballet gballet commented Sep 25, 2025

Name: Carlos Perez (@CPerezz)
Team: Stateless Consensus
Start time: 2025-03
Weight: 1

Eligibility: Carlos has officially joined the Stateless Consensus teams at the EF in March 2025, although he had been contributing to the Ethereum Protocol long before that. His contributions prior to joining the team, includes working on the initial effort to create zkevms, from which the modern zkvm stems. His current work is just as foundational, working on some form of out-of-protocol state expiry (VOPS), leading the bloatnet effort, and helping with benchmarking the state-access instructions in order to determine their exact pricing.

Non-exhaustive list of his contributions:

@gballet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gballet commented Sep 25, 2025

btw this is removing Ignacio but #400 adds him back temporarily re-adding him until the PR is merged

Copy link
Collaborator

@MariusVanDerWijden MariusVanDerWijden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have worked with Carlos in the context of bloatnet and state repricing, glad to have you onboard!

| [Milos Stankovic](https://github.com/morph-dev) | 1 | [morph-dev/pglanding-morph-dev](https://github.com/morph-dev/pglanding-morph-dev) |
| [Toni Wahrstätter](https://github.com/nerolation) | 1 | [nerolation/pglanding-nerolation](https://github.com/nerolation/pglanding-nerolation) |
| [Rahul](https://github.com/raxhvl) | 1 | [raxhvl/pglanding-raxhvl](https://github.com/raxhvl/pglanding-raxhvl) |
| **Statelessness** (2 contributors) | | |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would be 3 according to the worldview of this PR for now -- since the other one has not been merged yet

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, but I'm counting on #400 being merged before and since that PR also changes the count, I'm trying to reduce the number of conflicts. I'll leave it to @tvanepps to decide about the practicalities.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

to be clear, #400 changes that very same line, I'm trying to avoid conflicts as much as possible.

@gballet gballet mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants