FIX: in py3.13 exec does not implicitly update locals() #8057
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
15 tasks
radarhere
reviewed
May 20, 2024
| exec(compile(f.read(), version_file, "exec")) | ||
| return locals()["__version__"] | ||
| lcl = {} | ||
| exec(compile(f.read(), version_file, "exec"), lcl) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lcl is the second argument to exec(). Looking at https://docs.python.org/3.13/library/functions.html#exec, this would be globals, right? So maybe lcl is a confusing name, because it makes one think that locals is being used instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh, yes it should have been second (I like the new ability to pass them as kwargs :) )
This was referenced May 20, 2024
|
We went for #8050, thanks anyway for the PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Alternative to #8050