Skip to content

Conversation

@johanneslumpe
Copy link
Contributor

Since we're already using destructuring here, we can skip the 2nd destructuring step and the delete (in order to avoid possible deoptimization of the function)

Since we're already using destructuring here, we can skip the 2nd destructuring step and the `delete` (in order to avoid possible deoptimization of the function)
@johanneslumpe johanneslumpe changed the title No need to use delete No need for a 2nd destructuring and delete Aug 4, 2015
erikras added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2015
No need for a 2nd destructuring and `delete`
@erikras erikras merged commit 0089f0f into redux-form:master Aug 4, 2015
@erikras
Copy link
Member

erikras commented Aug 4, 2015

Very nice!!

@johanneslumpe
Copy link
Contributor Author

argh

@johanneslumpe
Copy link
Contributor Author

it has a typo

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 2, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants