Skip to content

Conversation

@relu
Copy link
Contributor

@relu relu commented Oct 14, 2024

Fixes #42

Not sure if the built dist files should be included in the PR or not. Let me know and I can remove them if needed.

@AkihiroSuda
Copy link
Member

Fixes #42

Alternatively we may consider just using https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pkgs/container/busybox to avoid the Docker Hub rate limit?

@relu
Copy link
Contributor Author

relu commented Oct 21, 2024

Using the GHCR image as a default makes sense. I think it's still valuable to allow overriding the default container image.

@relu relu force-pushed the custom-image branch 3 times, most recently from 8495185 to a6159df Compare November 11, 2024 19:39
@relu
Copy link
Contributor Author

relu commented Nov 11, 2024

@AkihiroSuda I just got back to this and noticed that the ghcr.io/containerd/busybox repository is no longer actively maintained. The last update there is from two years ago. I've been trying to find an alternative but there's nothing on GHCR. I suppose the only remaining option is to revert to the DockerHub busybox image.

Copy link
Member

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, the BusyBox image is outdated, but I assume practically it doesn't matter

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda merged commit 7c89267 into reproducible-containers:main Nov 11, 2024
3 checks passed
@relu relu deleted the custom-image branch January 9, 2025 15:35
@relu relu restored the custom-image branch January 9, 2025 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Customizable busybox image

2 participants