-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Fixes to 10 coverity defect reports #480
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
55 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
af8c5d5
coverity bugfix 93580: parameters for day montha year were in wrong o…
89a4a67
coverity 94012: removed redundant unreachable return statement
harveyj1953 1f8f137
coverity 82573: fixed copy paste error fXaxis to fZaxis
harveyj1953 baa8987
Coverity 82274: fixed uninitialised class members
harveyj1953 7b0feb1
coverity 94049: class member not initialised
harveyj1953 7db5e8c
Coverity 94053: fixed uninitialised class members
harveyj1953 91ae895
4 coverity bugfixes
harveyj1953 4929ff4
coverity fixes: 63257, 62811, 62809, 62773, 62332, 62321
harveyj1953 c34c70d
coverity bugfixes: 62314,61873,61615,61605,61599,61590,61554
harveyj1953 f67b629
fixed missing initialisation of fModelFunction ptr
harveyj1953 76e5924
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
harveyj1953 b02cea7
coverity 68080: 2 uninitialised class members
harveyj1953 9805120
coverity 68081 and 68084: several uninitialised class members
harveyj1953 f8e16e0
coverity 68087 and 68086: uninitialised pointers
harveyj1953 c9e83d5
coverity bug: uninitialised pointer
harveyj1953 b69fb34
coverity 82584,82583,82582,82581,82580,82579
harveyj1953 2e9e71e
coverity 82578
harveyj1953 408d86c
Coverity 68966: truncated return value in mixmax
harveyj1953 09c2745
coverity 82576,82575
harveyj1953 6964ee8
coverity 68746,68745
harveyj1953 d013685
coverity 68958,68853,68852,68849
harveyj1953 b3ad363
coverity 68860,68857
harveyj1953 612bef3
coverity 68855
harveyj1953 d0c3af7
coverity 68962
harveyj1953 6694183
coverity 68958
harveyj1953 bb16018
coverity 68731,68730,68729
harveyj1953 590085e
coverity 68959
harveyj1953 c41182a
coverity 68856
harveyj1953 bb0c897
coverity 68080
harveyj1953 4cdb9db
coverity 68083
harveyj1953 a28cb14
coverity 68079,68078,68077
harveyj1953 b479b9d
coverity 68749
harveyj1953 f9f5674
reverting to original version of llvm code
harveyj1953 1b85376
coverity 68722: check result of dynamic cast in stressTMVA
harveyj1953 af624e1
coverity 68720 : check result of dynamic cast in TH1Merger
harveyj1953 b16d55c
coverity 68719: check result of dynamic cast in TH1Merger
harveyj1953 cac9d16
coverity 63257: uninitialised scalar field in GSLMultiFitFunctionWrapper
harveyj1953 6575e9a
coverity 623121 and 62311: uninitialised array elements
harveyj1953 24e88e0
coverity 62241,42,51,68: fixed 4 memory leaks in testGSLRootFinder
harveyj1953 4ea4427
Merge branch 'master' into master
peremato c6d9e58
Update testInterpolation.cxx
peremato 4b5eb01
Update stressTMVA.cxx
peremato 236ac40
Update testInterpolation.cxx
peremato f6a5aca
Update stressTMVA.cxx
peremato 85d68dd
resolving conflicts with master
harveyj1953 ff16837
coverity bug fix
harveyj1953 04fae88
reverting to original file after fix in R__ASSERT
harveyj1953 ccb3ec6
ignore MacOS specific .DS_Store
harveyj1953 c0cf732
coverity 94173: memory leak pointer libRIOHandler
harveyj1953 35a4f25
coverity 61562: memory leak pointer vars
harveyj1953 c469a01
memory leak variable c
harveyj1953 b122810
resolving merge conflicts
harveyj1953 4fcdc32
Revert "coverity 94173: memory leak pointer libRIOHandler"
harveyj1953 0d10d01
coverity 61577: re-fix of memory link using delete [] c
harveyj1953 1bfbde8
Update TFormulaTests.cxx
peremato File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Merge branch 'master' into master
- Loading branch information
commit 4ea4427dc894a5b3b9d30b305fd6fbc279c5cba7
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
You are viewing a condensed version of this merge commit. You can view the full changes here.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, was it intentional to increment
itwice: once in the loop and once in the loop's body (see last line).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand these changes too. The old code looked perfectly fine to me