Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 30, 2024. It is now read-only.

Removing code duplication in feature test#1623

Merged
cupakromer merged 1 commit into
rspec:masterfrom
treppo:master
Jun 29, 2014
Merged

Removing code duplication in feature test#1623
cupakromer merged 1 commit into
rspec:masterfrom
treppo:master

Conversation

@treppo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@treppo treppo commented Jun 29, 2014

The verification on the expectors was run twice in the feature test for the
integration of mocking frameworks. Tests still pass, maybe a millisecond faster.

The verification on the expectors was run twice in the feature test for the
integration of mocking frameworks. Tests still pass, maybe a millisecond faster.
@cupakromer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, build failure was due to a travis timeout. I'm sure it will pass, but I restarted it just for sanity purposes.

@cupakromer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @treppo

cupakromer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2014
Removing code duplication in feature test
@cupakromer cupakromer merged commit 7c34d18 into rspec:master Jun 29, 2014
cupakromer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2014
Removing code duplication in feature test

The verification on the expectors was run twice in the feature test for the
integration of mocking frameworks. Tests still pass, maybe a millisecond faster.
MatheusRich pushed a commit to MatheusRich/rspec-core that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2020
Removing code duplication in feature test
yujinakayama pushed a commit to yujinakayama/rspec-monorepo that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2021
Removing code duplication in feature test

The verification on the expectors was run twice in the feature test for the
integration of mocking frameworks. Tests still pass, maybe a millisecond faster.

---
This commit was imported from rspec/rspec-core@64696d1.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants