Skip to content

Conversation

WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member

This is likely to stop working in the future versions of Rust, see rust-lang/rust#122412 (comment).

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 4, 2024

r? @epage

rustbot has assigned @epage.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 4, 2024
@epage
Copy link
Contributor

epage commented Apr 5, 2024

Merging this more as a code cleanup. For this breaking in the future, I'm assuming that is non-urgent as I'm assuming a lot needs to be worked out to uphold stability expectations before that will matter.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 5, 2024

📌 Commit 898969e has been approved by epage

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 5, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 5, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 898969e with merge 1570666...

Copy link
Member

@weihanglo weihanglo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this block any crate run?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 5, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: epage
Pushing 1570666 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 1570666 into rust-lang:master Apr 5, 2024
@WaffleLapkin WaffleLapkin deleted the don't-the-err branch April 5, 2024 01:03
@WaffleLapkin
Copy link
Member Author

WaffleLapkin commented Apr 5, 2024

@epage yes, this is non urgent (although this needs to happen before the change, so that rustc's CI can pass), so I just made a PR since this is a simple change & is indeed a little cleanup.

@weihanglo this is required for the crater run on rust-lang/rust#122412, although I think I can workaround that.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

Thanks. I could do a cargo submodule update earlier if needed. Usually it happens on Tuesday and Friday.

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2024
Update cargo

9 commits in 0637083df5bbdcc951845f0d2eff6999cdb6d30a..28e7b2bc0a812f90126be30f48a00a4ada990eaa
2024-04-02 23:55:05 +0000 to 2024-04-05 19:31:01 +0000
- refactor(toml): Decouple target discovery from Target creation (rust-lang/cargo#13701)
- Don't depend on `?` affecting type inference in weird ways (rust-lang/cargo#13706)
- test(metadata): Show behavior with TOML-specific types (rust-lang/cargo#13703)
- fix: adjust tracing verbosity in list_files_git (rust-lang/cargo#13704)
- doc: comments on `PackageRegistry` (rust-lang/cargo#13698)
- Switch to using gitoxide by default for listing files (rust-lang/cargo#13696)
- Allow precise update to prerelease. (rust-lang/cargo#13626)
- refactor(toml): Split out an explicit step to resolve `Cargo.toml` (rust-lang/cargo#13693)
- chore(deps): update rust crate base64 to 0.22.0 (rust-lang/cargo#13675)

r? ghost
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.79.0 milestone Apr 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants