Skip to content

RFC: Collections reform #235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
alexcrichton merged 7 commits into from
Oct 29, 2014
Merged

RFC: Collections reform #235

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
5c31395
RFC: Collections reform
aturon Sep 5, 2014
4034f4a
Added drawbacks
aturon Sep 11, 2014
8ecd360
A few minor fixes
aturon Sep 11, 2014
4490dc7
Added alternative discussion for `for`
aturon Sep 11, 2014
d4e9e71
Fix bad references to self
aturon Sep 11, 2014
7eadf34
Substantially revised Borrow trait, add range proposal
aturon Sep 18, 2014
3825c86
Update with minor clarifications and adjustments
aturon Oct 27, 2014
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Added drawbacks
  • Loading branch information
@aturon
aturon committed Sep 11, 2014
commit 4034f4a965c178156d8ddbdadafd26f39b8da98b
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions active/0000-collections-conventions.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1577,6 +1577,10 @@ This is a tradeoff:
implicit magic, *especially* when it can involve hidden costs like cloning, so
the more explicit design given in this RFC seems best.

# Downsides

Design tradeoffs were discussed inline.

# Unresolved questions

## Unresolved conventions/APIs
Expand Down