Skip to content

add lang-team Major Change Proposals as a "pre-RFC" step #2936

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
nikomatsakis wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

add lang-team Major Change Proposals as a "pre-RFC" step #2936

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
c49bd46
adapt the Major Change Proposal for the lang-team
nikomatsakis May 27, 2020
6520df7
add links to flowchart
nikomatsakis May 27, 2020
23b3f34
fix spelling
nikomatsakis Jun 11, 2020
f0231b4
fix incomplete sentence
nikomatsakis Jun 11, 2020
035dc1f
discuss triage meeting
nikomatsakis Jun 11, 2020
d35c91b
mention MCP template
nikomatsakis Jun 11, 2020
b8246a6
clarify what happens to new T-lang RFCs
nikomatsakis Jun 11, 2020
a9f38ef
clarify reasons in favor of issues
nikomatsakis Jun 11, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
fix incomplete sentence
  • Loading branch information
@nikomatsakis
nikomatsakis committed Jun 11, 2020
commit f0231b4e13c47bc4b392d00ce6dd4baacf0a0220
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion text/0000-lang-team-mcp.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Reasons to decline a proposal, or to oppose the creation of a project group, inc
* There isn't available bandwidth to tackle the problem right now.
* In particular, it may require input from particular members who have the requisite expertise, and they may be too busy with other things.
* The proposed solutions disproportionate to the scale of the problem.
* For example, the solutions may be too invasive or they will likely be too much work to implement, and we can't really envision solutions that would
* For example, the solutions may have fundamental flaws, be too invasive, or be too much work to implement.
* The proposal is incomplete or is proposing a direction that seems wrong.
* The team may ask for the proposal to include more potential solutions, or to be rewritten to emphasize a particular direction that we think would be better. If the author of the proposal disagrees with that direction, they should make the case for the existing solutions, but of course the proposal may not ultimately be accepted if the lang team doesn't find that case persuasive

Expand Down