Skip to content

Conversation

Enselic
Copy link
Member

@Enselic Enselic commented Mar 12, 2024

Which is a variant of unix_sigpipe-list.rs but where a string is used instead of an identifier. This makes it more similar to the proper form #[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"] and thus more likely to be written by users by mistake. Having a test for this case gives peace of mind.

Also rename the first test to be more in line with the terminology of The Reference.

Tracking issue: #97889

Which is a variant of [`unix_sigpipe-list.rs`][1] but where a string is
used instead of an identifier. This makes it more similar to the proper
form `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]` and thus more likely to be written by
users by mistake. Also rename the first test to be more in line with the
terminology of [The Reference][2].

[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-list.rs
[2]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#meta-item-attribute-syntax
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 12, 2024

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 12, 2024
@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Mar 12, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 12, 2024

📌 Commit 98553ce has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 12, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
…kingjubilee

Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#121754 ([bootstrap] Move the `split-debuginfo` setting to the per-target section)
 - rust-lang#121953 (Add tests for the generated assembly of mask related simd instructions.)
 - rust-lang#122081 (validate `builder::PATH_REMAP`)
 - rust-lang#122245 (Detect truncated DepGraph files)
 - rust-lang#122354 (bootstrap: Don't eagerly format verbose messages)
 - rust-lang#122355 (rustdoc: fix up old test)
 - rust-lang#122363 (tests: Add ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-str-list.rs)
 - rust-lang#122366 (Fix stack overflow with recursive associated types)
 - rust-lang#122377 (Fix discriminant_kind copy paste from the pointee trait case)
 - rust-lang#122378 (Properly rebuild rustbooks)
 - rust-lang#122380 (Fix typo in lib.rs of proc_macro)
 - rust-lang#122381 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 778c76c into rust-lang:master Mar 12, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Mar 12, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122363 - Enselic:unix_sigpipe-str-list, r=oli-obk

tests: Add ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-str-list.rs

Which is a variant of [`unix_sigpipe-list.rs`][1] but where a string is used instead of an identifier. This makes it more similar to the proper form `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]` and thus more likely to be written by users by mistake. Having a test for this case gives peace of mind.

Also rename the first test to be more in line with the terminology of [The Reference][2].

[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/ui/attributes/unix_sigpipe/unix_sigpipe-list.rs
[2]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes.html#meta-item-attribute-syntax

Tracking issue: rust-lang#97889
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants