Skip to content

Conversation

okaneco
Copy link
Contributor

@okaneco okaneco commented Aug 7, 2025

Add codegen test for issue where valid_index.saturating_sub(X) produced an extra bounds check.
This was fixed by the LLVM upgrade.

Closes #139759

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 7, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 7, 2025
@okaneco okaneco force-pushed the saturating_sub_regression_tests branch from 77e7ee3 to 9647d03 Compare August 7, 2025 18:58
Add codegen test for issue where `valid_index.saturating_sub(X)` produced an
extra bounds check.
This was fixed by the LLVM upgrade.
@okaneco okaneco force-pushed the saturating_sub_regression_tests branch from 9647d03 to 163594c Compare August 7, 2025 19:12
Copy link
Member

@xizheyin xizheyin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on experience, I think using test cases with suffixes such as *-issue-139759.rs seems to be more common (whether to change it or not is up to you). In any case, everything else is fine.

@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Aug 10, 2025

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 10, 2025

📌 Commit 163594c has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 10, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #144553 (Rehome 32 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/`)
 - #145064 (Add regression test for `saturating_sub` bounds check issue)
 - #145121 (bootstrap: `x.py dist rustc-src` should keep LLVM's siphash)
 - #145150 (Replace unsafe `security_attributes` function with safe `inherit_handle` alternative)
 - #145152 (Use `eq_ignore_ascii_case` to avoid heap alloc in `detect_confuse_type`)
 - #145200 (mbe: Fix typo in attribute tracing)
 - #145222 (Fix typo with paren rustc_llvm/build.rs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit a7a4e17 into rust-lang:master Aug 10, 2025
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.91.0 milestone Aug 10, 2025
@okaneco okaneco deleted the saturating_sub_regression_tests branch August 10, 2025 23:44
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2025
Rollup merge of #145064 - okaneco:saturating_sub_regression_tests, r=nikic

Add regression test for `saturating_sub` bounds check issue

Add codegen test for issue where `valid_index.saturating_sub(X)` produced an extra bounds check.
This was fixed by the LLVM upgrade.

Closes #139759
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bounds check not elided for index that should be known to be in-bounds
7 participants