Skip to content

Conversation

tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

@tgross35 tgross35 commented Jun 9, 2025

This lint is allowed in a few places where it doesn't seem to be needed. The missing_fragment_specifier lint will be going away in a future version of Rust and replaced with a hard error 1, so update this now to avoid a future unknown_lints warning.

This lint is `allow`ed in a few places where it doesn't seem to be
needed. The `missing_fragment_specifier` lint will be going away in a
future version of Rust and replaced with a hard error [1], so update
this now to avoid a future `unknown_lints` warning.

[1]: rust-lang/rust#128425
@tgross35
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgross35 commented Jun 9, 2025

This seems to be the only actively developed public repository that allows this lint, seemed like an easy enough fix to put up :)

@tmpfs tmpfs merged commit 1e3749c into saveoursecrets:main Jul 11, 2025
@tmpfs
Copy link
Collaborator

tmpfs commented Jul 11, 2025

Thanks @tgross35 👍

@tgross35 tgross35 deleted the no-missing-fragment-specifier branch July 11, 2025 05:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants