[Chore] Build with LTS-21.0, prepare a release#289
Conversation
ec88257 to
0b51591
Compare
b95f0b4 to
4bbcc50
Compare
|
Uh. You forgot to bump stack's ghc version in |
8f36772 to
f42a7f5
Compare
|
WTH, Windows build dies horribly while trying to link tests on 9.4.5. |
Do you think Morley can wait for this to me properly resolved by devops, or we better try to invent a workaround, e.g. ignore Windows support? |
Frankly, I'm not entirely convinced there's something "to be properly resolved" here, I've since seen GHC 9.4.5 segfaulting on Windows when trying to build stuff, too, so probably it's just that 🤷 Sigh. I can take a closer look though, if you want. The first thing I'd suggest trying is building with
Honestly, I just want to get the update over with, so I can play around with the cool stuff like But arguably we want to push out the release sooner rather than later, if for no other reason than Universum not being on Stackage means Hoogle doesn't index it and that's annoying 😒 |
Can I offload this to you to try then? Or I could go with your guesses, but it would definitely take more time. |
Sure |
|
Oh well, apparently it was just cabal 3.6 not playing ball with newer ghc. |
lierdakil
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Other than the note about bumping GHC's patch-versions we're testing with, LGTM.
Problem: we aim at supporting the recent LTS-21.0 which uses GHC-9.4.5. That is two minor versions ahead from the recent GHC we currently test with, so let's include GHC-9.4.5 in the list too. Solution: * add `GHC-9.4.5` to our `ci.yml` + also update used `stack` version by the way * remove the oldest `GHC-8.6.5` * update `tested-with` section in `.cabal` file accordingly
Problem: apparently after the recent addition of `Eq` superclass to `Hashable` and our attempts to fix that in be02075, some redundant constraints remained (GHC does not always recognize redundant constraints). With GHC-9.4 this brings us warnings. Solution: use `MIN_VERSION` pragma to remove `Eq` constraint for `hashable >= 1.4.0`.
Problem: one import is necessary for the rewrite rule, and this rule is disabled for `text >= 2.0.2`. Solution: disable the import conditionally in the same way.
af8c977 to
0b9fe96
Compare
|
Just in case: @gromakovsky would you like to check this once again, or I can merge? |
|
ping @gromakovsky @Martoon-00 can we get this over with? 😅 |
|
Oh, let me look now 👀 |
| default-extensions: ExplicitNamespaces | ||
| NoImplicitPrelude | ||
| ScopedTypeVariables | ||
| TypeOperators |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A couple of nitpicks:
- According to this page,
ExplicitNamespacesis implied byTypeOperators. Is it necessary to enable it explicitly? - Since
TypeOperatorsis enabled for almost each component, it might be to put it intocommon-options.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That makes sense, changed.
What do you mean by "safe"? AFAIK when you increase |
gromakovsky
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've suggested a couple of small changes, I think they are not important and can be considered optional, so feel free to merge.
Hackage PVP is rather specific in what it calls "breaking changes":
nope
also no
not to my knowledge
Although, that all includes dependencies, and that all gets rather vague with instances in |
|
So long story short, |
Problem: nowadays `~` is not a built-in operator, rather a definition coming from `Data.Type.Equality`. This makes `VarArg` module fail. Solution: add a conditional import to `VarArg` module. Also, start re-exporting the `~` operator from universum.
Problem: `universum` has been excluded from the recent LTS, at least because we do not support the most recent version of `text` package. This issue with `text` has been fixed, and we need a new version with the fix. Solution: bump the version from `1.8.1.2` to `1.8.2`, since among changes in definitions we only started exporting `~`.
Problem: the comment in the CI config says "Use only the latest compiler on non-Linux", but GHC 8.10.7 is also included for some reason. Solution: exclude it.
Problem: older versions of GHC we test against have got new patches, and new versions `9.0.2` and `9.2.8` are supported. Solution: test against them in CI.
Problem: it's not really fixed anywhere, whether should we have an empty `Unreleased` section in our changelog, or better go without it. Solution: we agreed with @Gromak that it's better to leave no empty section (so that it does not appear on Hackage). So as a clarification, on our PR template I change the point about changelog (for regular PRs, not as part of release routine) to mention the creation of `Unreleased` section if it is absent.
e7f4592 to
0b16c4b
Compare
We want to make universum work with the recent LTS-21.0, that would at least be helpful for Morley project.
So make CI test against the most recent GHC version, do the necessary changes.
The prepare the next release.
Description
Related to #288
Related issues(s)
Fixed #
✓ Checklist for your Pull Request
Ideally a PR has all of the checkmarks set.
If something in this list is irrelevant to your PR, you should still set this
checkmark indicating that you are sure it is dealt with (be that by irrelevance).
are inextricably linked. Otherwise I should open multiple PR's.
I checked whether these changes impact the
.hlint.yamlrulesand updated them if needed.
Related changes (conditional)
Tests
silently reappearing again.
Documentation
I checked whether I should update the docs and did so if necessary:
Record your changes
and
Stylistic guide (mandatory)
My commit history is clean (only contains changes relating to my
issue/pull request and no reverted-my-earlier-commit changes) and commit
messages start with identifiers of related issues in square brackets.
Example:
[#42] Short commit descriptionIf necessary both of these can be achieved even after the commits have been
made/pushed using rebase and squash.
✓ Release Checklist
universum.cabal.under the "Unreleased" section to a new section for this release version.
I added
@sincehaddock annotations.with a summary of all user-facing changes.
vX.Y.Z