This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 22, 2025. It is now read-only.
DOCS: Update leader-rotation.md #18192
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Confusing wording regarding epoch length
mvines
added
v1.7
automerge
Contributor
|
Lol Google. Thanks for the PR! |
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2021
Confusing wording regarding epoch length (cherry picked from commit 6b62ba0)
mergify bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 24, 2021
Confusing wording regarding epoch length (cherry picked from commit 6b62ba0) Co-authored-by: Marcel Jackisch <[email protected]>
Closed
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Confusing wording regarding epoch length, which is stated as 100. ("For example" does not really mean "100 is fictional")
Summary of Changes
Made clear it's a fictive number