fix: remove unnecessary RUnlock #380
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
volmedo
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2025
Member
volmedo
left a comment
volmedo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM.
It's still weird to see a RLock without its matching RUnlock in spite of the comment 😅
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per the discussion in ipfs/go-ds-flatfs#139 this PR pull in the documenation change from ipfs/go-ds-flatfs#141 and removes the
RUnlockcalls that were added.