-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
Builder-Vite: Fix defaulting to allowing all hosts #30523
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8b0fb30
don't default to server.allowedHosts = true
JReinhold ec1ef51
show error log in console and DOM when vite app could not load
JReinhold de265a7
Merge branch 'next' into jeppe/partially-revert-vite-allowedhosts
JReinhold e549d42
Merge branch 'next' into jeppe/partially-revert-vite-allowedhosts
shilman fc7404d
fix lint and check
JReinhold 65548b1
Merge branch 'jeppe/partially-revert-vite-allowedhosts' of github.com…
JReinhold File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
style: The IP regex will match invalid IPs like 999.999.999.999. Consider using a more robust IP validation method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This regex gets too complex. Please add a comment of what it actually should match.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd love to, but I didnt write it so I dont know 🤷♀️
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@valentinpalkovic @JReinhold I wrote the original PR that introduced this. The reason for the IP Regex is to identify if an ip address was used for the host, instead of a hostname, with the logic to set
allowedHosts: trueif an ip address was used instead of a hostname. The Regex is for any IPv4 or IPv6 ip address. Note, it looks like this logic was removed, and now no allowed host is set when the host is an ip address, this may be a logical flaw, my original issue was for when I was binding an ip address'0.0.0.0'to host that I couldn't access storybook with a hostname.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the explanation @JSMike. ❤️
Could you open a PR adding the required logic back, with an explanation of which problem it solves? Sounds like you know a lot about this problem already.