Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

This is an automated pull request that bumps the version from 9.2.0-alpha.1 to 9.2.0-alpha.2.
Once this pull request is merged, it will trigger a new release of version 9.2.0-alpha.2.
If you're not a core maintainer with permissions to release you can ignore this pull request.

To do

Before merging the PR, there are a few QA steps to go through:

  • Add the "freeze" label to this PR, to ensure it doesn't get automatically forced pushed by new changes.
  • Add the "ci:daily" label to this PR, to trigger the full test suite to run on this PR.

And for each change below:

  1. Ensure the change is appropriate for the version bump. E.g. patch release should only contain patches, not new or de-stabilizing features. If a change is not appropriate, revert the PR.
  2. Ensure the PR is labeled correctly with one of: "BREAKING CHANGE", "feature request", "bug", "maintenance", "dependencies", "documentation", "build", "unknown".
  3. Ensure the PR title is correct, and follows the format "[Area]: [Summary]", e.g. "React: Fix hooks in CSF3 render functions". If it is not correct, change the title in the PR.
    • Areas include: React, Vue, Core, Docs, Controls, etc.
    • First word of summary indicates the type: “Add”, “Fix”, “Upgrade”, etc.
    • The entire title should fit on a line

This is a list of all the PRs merged and commits pushed directly to next, that will be part of this release:

  • 🔧 Maintenance: Onboarding: Tweak referral wording in survey #32185 (will also be patched)
  • 📝 Documentation: CLI: Fix Docs migration link in migrations #32196
  • 📝 Documentation: Docs: Fix broken link in migration guide #32198 (will also be patched)
  • 📝 Documentation: Docs: Add afterEach guidance #32156 (will also be patched)
  • 📝 Documentation: CLI: Fixed broken migration guide link #32148
  • 📝 Documentation: Docs: Further improvements #32166 (will also be patched)

If you've made any changes doing the above QA (change PR titles, revert PRs), manually trigger a re-generation of this PR with this workflow and wait for it to finish. It will wipe your progress in this to do, which is expected.

Feel free to manually commit any changes necessary to this branch after you've done the last re-generation, following the Make Manual Changes section in the docs, especially if you're making changes to the changelog.

When everything above is done:


Generated changelog

9.2.0-alpha.2

  • Onboarding: Tweak referral wording in survey - #32185, thanks shilman!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the release For PRs that trigger new releases. Automated label Aug 4, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the release For PRs that trigger new releases. Automated label Aug 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

9 files reviewed, 5 comments

Edit Code Review Bot Settings | Greptile

Comment on lines +5 to +7
sb.mock(import('../lib/session.ts'), { spy: true });
// 👇 Automatically spies on all exports from the `uuid` package in `node_modules`
sb.mock(import('uuid'), { spy: true });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style: TypeScript version uses import() wrapper while JavaScript version uses string paths - this inconsistency might confuse users about when to use each approach

Comment on lines +5 to +7
sb.mock(import('../lib/session.ts'));
// 👇 Replaces imports of this module with imports to `../__mocks__/uuid.ts`
sb.mock(import('uuid'));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style: Inconsistent file extensions in comments - session.ts mock but uuid.ts for JavaScript package. Consider using .js for consistency in JS examples or clarify the extension handling.

Comment on lines +16 to +18
sb.mock('../lib/session.js');
// 👇 Replaces imports of this module with imports to `../__mocks__/uuid.ts`
sb.mock('uuid');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

syntax: File extension mismatch: comment references session.ts and uuid.ts but the actual mock calls use .js extension. The comments should match the implementation.

Comment on lines +79 to +82
beforeEach: async () => {
// 👇 Force known, consistent behavior for mocked modules
uuidv4.mockReturnValue('1234-5678-90ab-cdef');
getUserFromSession.mockReturnValue({ name: 'John Doe' });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

style: Inconsistent pattern: JavaScript examples directly call mock methods on imports while TypeScript examples use the mocked wrapper. This could confuse users about whether the wrapper is required or just for types.


**Vite projects**

The root `__mocks__` directory should be placed in the [`root` directory](https://vite.dev/config/shared-options.html#root), as defined in your project's Vite configuration (typically `process.cwd()`) If that is unavailable, it defaults to the directory containing your `.storybook` directory.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

syntax: Missing period after 'typically process.cwd())'

Suggested change
The root `__mocks__` directory should be placed in the [`root` directory](https://vite.dev/config/shared-options.html#root), as defined in your project's Vite configuration (typically `process.cwd()`) If that is unavailable, it defaults to the directory containing your `.storybook` directory.
The root `__mocks__` directory should be placed in the [`root` directory](https://vite.dev/config/shared-options.html#root), as defined in your project's Vite configuration (typically `process.cwd()`). If that is unavailable, it defaults to the directory containing your `.storybook` directory.

@storybook-bot storybook-bot force-pushed the version-non-patch-from-9.2.0-alpha.1 branch from cee9c09 to 1277cb2 Compare August 5, 2025 16:48
@storybook-bot storybook-bot force-pushed the version-non-patch-from-9.2.0-alpha.1 branch from 1277cb2 to 0de3b31 Compare August 5, 2025 17:33
@storybook-bot storybook-bot force-pushed the version-non-patch-from-9.2.0-alpha.1 branch from 0de3b31 to 0a3dac7 Compare August 5, 2025 21:35
@storybook-bot storybook-bot force-pushed the version-non-patch-from-9.2.0-alpha.1 branch from 0a3dac7 to 738ca0c Compare August 6, 2025 08:00
@yannbf yannbf added freeze Freeze the Release PR with this label ci:daily Run the CI jobs that normally run in the daily job. labels Aug 6, 2025
@nx-cloud
Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Aug 6, 2025

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit 738ca0c

Command Status Duration Result
nx run-many -t check -c production --parallel=7 ✅ Succeeded 1s View ↗
nx run-many -t build -c production --parallel=3 ✅ Succeeded 2s View ↗

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-08-06 12:05:24 UTC

@yannbf yannbf merged commit 14b4a37 into next-release Aug 6, 2025
91 of 94 checks passed
@yannbf yannbf deleted the version-non-patch-from-9.2.0-alpha.1 branch August 6, 2025 12:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci:daily Run the CI jobs that normally run in the daily job. freeze Freeze the Release PR with this label release For PRs that trigger new releases. Automated

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants