-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
CLI: Update compatibility guidance link in summary message #33117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit fefd0b7
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughReplaced a Storybook compatibility GitHub issue reference (issue 30944) with a new issue reference (32836) in the incompatible-packages guidance text; no control-flow or API changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes
✨ Finishing touches
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (4)📓 Common learnings📚 Learning: 2025-11-05T09:38:47.712ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-11-05T09:37:25.920ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-10-01T15:24:01.060ZApplied to files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
code/lib/cli-storybook/src/doctor/getIncompatibleStorybookPackages.ts (1)
161-163: Updated compatibility guidance link and formatting look goodThe new wording and separate URL line integrate cleanly with the existing summary formatting and don’t affect logic. If there’s ever a canonical docs page for compatibility guidance (instead of a GitHub issue), consider pointing this message there for longer‑term stability, but this is fine as is.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
code/lib/cli-storybook/src/doctor/getIncompatibleStorybookPackages.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Sidnioulz
Repo: storybookjs/storybook PR: 32458
File: code/core/src/components/components/Select/Select.tsx:200-204
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T09:38:47.712Z
Learning: Repo: storybookjs/storybook — Guidance: Until Storybook 11 is released, do not suggest using React.useId anywhere (e.g., in code/core/src/components/components/Select/Select.tsx) to maintain compatibility with React 17 runtimes. Prefer advising: accept a caller-provided props.id and, if needed, generate a client-only fallback id to minimize SSR hydration issues — but avoid useId. Resume prompting for useId after Storybook 11.
Learnt from: Sidnioulz
Repo: storybookjs/storybook PR: 32458
File: code/core/src/components/components/tooltip/WithTooltip.tsx:54-96
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T09:37:25.920Z
Learning: Repo: storybookjs/storybook — In code/core/src/components/components/tooltip/WithTooltip.tsx, the legacy WithTooltip implementation is intentionally reintroduced for backward compatibility and is deprecated; maintainers (per Sidnioulz) do not want maintenance or improvements on it. Prefer WithTooltipNew/Popover; avoid suggesting changes to WithTooltip.* going forward.
Learnt from: Sidnioulz
Repo: storybookjs/storybook PR: 32594
File: code/core/src/components/components/Popover/WithPopover.tsx:7-9
Timestamp: 2025-10-01T15:24:01.060Z
Learning: In the Storybook repository, "react-aria-components/patched-dist/*" (e.g., "react-aria-components/patched-dist/Dialog", "react-aria-components/patched-dist/Popover", "react-aria-components/patched-dist/Tooltip") are valid import paths created by a patch applied to the react-aria-components package. These imports should not be flagged as broken or invalid until a maintainer explicitly states they are no longer acceptable.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-05T09:38:47.712Z
Learnt from: Sidnioulz
Repo: storybookjs/storybook PR: 32458
File: code/core/src/components/components/Select/Select.tsx:200-204
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T09:38:47.712Z
Learning: Repo: storybookjs/storybook — Guidance: Until Storybook 11 is released, do not suggest using React.useId anywhere (e.g., in code/core/src/components/components/Select/Select.tsx) to maintain compatibility with React 17 runtimes. Prefer advising: accept a caller-provided props.id and, if needed, generate a client-only fallback id to minimize SSR hydration issues — but avoid useId. Resume prompting for useId after Storybook 11.
Applied to files:
code/lib/cli-storybook/src/doctor/getIncompatibleStorybookPackages.ts
📚 Learning: 2025-11-05T09:37:25.920Z
Learnt from: Sidnioulz
Repo: storybookjs/storybook PR: 32458
File: code/core/src/components/components/tooltip/WithTooltip.tsx:54-96
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T09:37:25.920Z
Learning: Repo: storybookjs/storybook — In code/core/src/components/components/tooltip/WithTooltip.tsx, the legacy WithTooltip implementation is intentionally reintroduced for backward compatibility and is deprecated; maintainers (per Sidnioulz) do not want maintenance or improvements on it. Prefer WithTooltipNew/Popover; avoid suggesting changes to WithTooltip.* going forward.
Applied to files:
code/lib/cli-storybook/src/doctor/getIncompatibleStorybookPackages.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: normal
- GitHub Check: get-branch
- GitHub Check: Core Unit Tests, windows-latest
514dd98 to
fefd0b7
Compare
Closes #
What I did
Checklist for Contributors
Testing
The changes in this PR are covered in the following automated tests:
Manual testing
This section is mandatory for all contributions. If you believe no manual test is necessary, please state so explicitly. Thanks!
Documentation
MIGRATION.MD
Checklist for Maintainers
When this PR is ready for testing, make sure to add
ci:normal,ci:mergedorci:dailyGH label to it to run a specific set of sandboxes. The particular set of sandboxes can be found incode/lib/cli-storybook/src/sandbox-templates.tsMake sure this PR contains one of the labels below:
Available labels
bug: Internal changes that fixes incorrect behavior.maintenance: User-facing maintenance tasks.dependencies: Upgrading (sometimes downgrading) dependencies.build: Internal-facing build tooling & test updates. Will not show up in release changelog.cleanup: Minor cleanup style change. Will not show up in release changelog.documentation: Documentation only changes. Will not show up in release changelog.feature request: Introducing a new feature.BREAKING CHANGE: Changes that break compatibility in some way with current major version.other: Changes that don't fit in the above categories.🦋 Canary release
This PR does not have a canary release associated. You can request a canary release of this pull request by mentioning the
@storybookjs/coreteam here.core team members can create a canary release here or locally with
gh workflow run --repo storybookjs/storybook publish.yml --field pr=<PR_NUMBER>Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Tests
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.