-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
Interactions: Fix state reset bug when switching stories with date mocks #33388
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit aef650d
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughReworks the STORY_RENDER_PHASE_CHANGED handler in Panel.tsx: renames Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
✨ Finishing touches
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (5)**/*.{js,jsx,json,html,ts,tsx,mjs}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Files:
**/*.{ts,tsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Files:
code/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx,mjs}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Files:
code/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Files:
code/**/*.{js,jsx,json,html,ts,tsx,mjs}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Files:
🧠 Learnings (4)📓 Common learnings📚 Learning: 2025-11-05T09:38:47.712ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-11-05T09:36:55.944ZApplied to files:
📚 Learning: 2025-09-18T20:51:06.618ZApplied to files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
code/core/src/component-testing/components/Panel.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
**/*.{js,jsx,json,html,ts,tsx,mjs}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Use ESLint and Prettier configurations that are enforced in the codebase
Files:
code/core/src/component-testing/components/Panel.tsx
**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Enable TypeScript strict mode
Files:
code/core/src/component-testing/components/Panel.tsx
code/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx,mjs}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
code/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx,mjs}: Use server-side logger from 'storybook/internal/node-logger' for Node.js code
Use client-side logger from 'storybook/internal/client-logger' for browser code
Do not use console.log, console.warn, or console.error directly unless in isolated files where importing loggers would significantly increase bundle size
Files:
code/core/src/component-testing/components/Panel.tsx
code/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Export functions that need to be tested from their modules
Files:
code/core/src/component-testing/components/Panel.tsx
code/**/*.{js,jsx,json,html,ts,tsx,mjs}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
code/**/*.{js,jsx,json,html,ts,tsx,mjs}: Run Prettier with --write flag to format code before committing
Run ESLint with yarn lint:js:cmd to check for linting issues and fix errors before committing
Files:
code/core/src/component-testing/components/Panel.tsx
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Sidnioulz
Repo: storybookjs/storybook PR: 32458
File: code/core/src/components/components/Select/Select.tsx:200-204
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T09:38:47.712Z
Learning: Repo: storybookjs/storybook — Guidance: Until Storybook 11 is released, do not suggest using React.useId anywhere (e.g., in code/core/src/components/components/Select/Select.tsx) to maintain compatibility with React 17 runtimes. Prefer advising: accept a caller-provided props.id and, if needed, generate a client-only fallback id to minimize SSR hydration issues — but avoid useId. Resume prompting for useId after Storybook 11.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-05T09:38:47.712Z
Learnt from: Sidnioulz
Repo: storybookjs/storybook PR: 32458
File: code/core/src/components/components/Select/Select.tsx:200-204
Timestamp: 2025-11-05T09:38:47.712Z
Learning: Repo: storybookjs/storybook — Guidance: Until Storybook 11 is released, do not suggest using React.useId anywhere (e.g., in code/core/src/components/components/Select/Select.tsx) to maintain compatibility with React 17 runtimes. Prefer advising: accept a caller-provided props.id and, if needed, generate a client-only fallback id to minimize SSR hydration issues — but avoid useId. Resume prompting for useId after Storybook 11.
Applied to files:
code/core/src/component-testing/components/Panel.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (5)
- GitHub Check: normal
- GitHub Check: nx
- GitHub Check: nx
- GitHub Check: nx
- GitHub Check: Core Unit Tests, windows-latest
| if (lastStoryId.current === event.storyId) { | ||
| lastRenderId.current = Math.max(lastRenderId.current, event.renderId || 0); | ||
| } else { | ||
| lastRenderId.current = event.renderId || 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just wondering whether this should always be 0 rather than event.renderId, or would that break things? Not sure.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we don't initialise it to the id for the current event, then we'll hit the code below that bails out when multiple concurrent renders exist.
|
@Sidnioulz is this a sufficient fix or do we still need to revisit the use of dates for this? |
It seems sufficient. I think we can leave it at that, and if we see more issues / next time we build an ID system, we can use a global sequential counter instead. |
d5be5e7 to
aef650d
Compare
Closes #32834
What I did
Forced a reset of
lastRenderIdwhen switching stories, to ensure we account for the fact thatDate.now()can be mocked in a story.Checklist for Contributors
Testing
Manual testing
Without the canary, the state will not be properly cleared.
Documentation
ø
Checklist for Maintainers
When this PR is ready for testing, make sure to add
ci:normal,ci:mergedorci:dailyGH label to it to run a specific set of sandboxes. The particular set of sandboxes can be found incode/lib/cli-storybook/src/sandbox-templates.tsMake sure this PR contains one of the labels below:
Available labels
bug: Internal changes that fixes incorrect behavior.maintenance: User-facing maintenance tasks.dependencies: Upgrading (sometimes downgrading) dependencies.build: Internal-facing build tooling & test updates. Will not show up in release changelog.cleanup: Minor cleanup style change. Will not show up in release changelog.documentation: Documentation only changes. Will not show up in release changelog.feature request: Introducing a new feature.BREAKING CHANGE: Changes that break compatibility in some way with current major version.other: Changes that don't fit in the above categories.🦋 Canary release
This PR does not have a canary release associated. You can request a canary release of this pull request by mentioning the
@storybookjs/coreteam here.core team members can create a canary release here or locally with
gh workflow run --repo storybookjs/storybook publish.yml --field pr=<PR_NUMBER>Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.