Skip to content

Fix source maps of variant utilities that come from an @layer rule #12508

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
thecrypticace merged 5 commits into from
Dec 1, 2023
Merged

Fix source maps of variant utilities that come from an @layer rule #12508

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
6828f84
Refactor
thecrypticace Nov 29, 2023
09f2c6f
Keep traversing sibling nodes
thecrypticace Nov 29, 2023
2aedd64
Make sure the root node has a source location for the end
thecrypticace Nov 29, 2023
f49429e
Add source map test for at-rule variants
thecrypticace Dec 1, 2023
441d8dc
Update changelog
thecrypticace Dec 1, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Make sure the root node has a source location for the end
  • Loading branch information
@thecrypticace
thecrypticace committed Dec 1, 2023
commit 2aedd6422ccda174ff007bdc8aeb8c6cc6176afd
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions src/lib/expandTailwindAtRules.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ export default function expandTailwindAtRules(context) {
root.append(cloned)
}

// TODO: Why is the root node having no source location for `end` possible?
root.source.end = root.source.end ?? root.source.start

// If we've got a utility layer and no utilities are generated there's likely something wrong
const hasUtilityVariants = variantNodes.some(
(node) => node.raws.tailwind?.parentLayer === 'utilities'
Expand Down