enh: optimize performance while scalar subquery as primary key condtion#34027
enh: optimize performance while scalar subquery as primary key condtion#34027guanshengliang merged 3 commits into3.0from
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @dapan1121, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses on optimizing the performance of database queries that incorporate scalar subqueries within primary key conditions, such as those applied to timestamps ( Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a performance optimization for scalar subqueries used as primary key conditions. The overall approach is sound, involving separating these conditions during planning and evaluating them at execution time. The changes are well-integrated throughout the codebase. However, I've identified a few issues that should be addressed: a typo in a function name, a high-severity error-masking bug in the new logic, and a potential high-severity race condition involving a global variable. My review includes detailed explanations and suggestions for fixing these issues.
| int32_t scalarCalculateRemoteConstants(SNode *pNode, SNode **pRes) { | ||
| gTaskScalarExtra.pStreamInfo = NULL; | ||
| gTaskScalarExtra.pStreamRange = NULL; | ||
| return sclCalcConstants(pNode, false, true, pRes, &gTaskScalarExtra); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This function modifies the global variable gTaskScalarExtra. If scalarCalculateRemoteConstants can be executed by multiple threads concurrently, this will cause a data race, leading to unpredictable behavior. If gTaskScalarExtra is not already thread-local, it should be made thread-local (e.g., using __thread or _Thread_local) or the necessary state should be passed as a parameter to ensure thread safety.
source/libs/executor/src/executil.c
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| int32_t initQueryTableDataCond(SQueryTableDataCond* pCond, const STableScanPhysiNode* pTableScanNode, | ||
| static int32_t getPrimayTimeRange(SNode** pPrimaryKeyCond, STimeWindow* pTimeRange, bool* isStrict) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Description
Issue(s)
Checklist
Please check the items in the checklist if applicable.