-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
feat(assertions): add StringComparison parameter to string assertions #3411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job PR Review: String Assertions with StringComparison ParameterI've completed my review of this pull request that adds StringComparison parameter support to string assertions. Todo List:
Review SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVE - This is a well-implemented, backward-compatible feature that enhances the string assertion API with proper StringComparison support. 🎯 StrengthsCode Quality & Design
Architecture & Patterns
Public API Changes
🔍 Technical AnalysisPerformance Considerations
Security & Safety
AOT/Trimming Compatibility
📋 Implementation Details ReviewExcellent Pattern ConsistencyEach assertion class follows the identical pattern: // Field with sensible default
private StringComparison _comparison = StringComparison.Ordinal;
// Constructor overload accepting comparison
public StringXxxAssertion(..., StringComparison comparison) { ... }
// Fluent method for runtime configuration
public StringXxxAssertion WithComparison(StringComparison comparison) { ... }Proper Integration Points
🧪 Test Coverage AssessmentCurrent State
Recommendations for Follow-upWhile not blocking for this PR, consider adding explicit tests covering:
🎯 Minor ObservationsDesign Decision Questions (Not blocking)
✅ Repository Guidelines Compliance
🎉 ConclusionThis is a high-quality implementation that:
Recommended action: ✅ Merge - This PR is ready for integration. |
Fixes #3399