-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
feat(analyzer): add support for IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync method in DisposableFieldPropertyAnalyzer #3574
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…hod in DisposableFieldPropertyAnalyzer
…leFieldPropertyAnalyzer
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job PR Review: feat(analyzer): add support for IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync method in DisposableFieldPropertyAnalyzerTodo List:
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis PR successfully extends the ✅ Code Quality & Best PracticesExcellent Implementation
Well-Structured LogicThe new // Check for IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync()
var isInitializeAsyncMethod = false;
if (methodSymbol is { Name: "InitializeAsync", Parameters.IsDefaultOrEmpty: true })
{
var asyncInitializer = context.Compilation.GetTypeByMetadataName("TUnit.Core.Interfaces.IAsyncInitializer");
if (asyncInitializer != null && methodSymbol.ContainingType.Interfaces.Any(x =>
SymbolEqualityComparer.Default.Equals(x, asyncInitializer)))
{
isInitializeAsyncMethod = true;
level = HookLevel.Test;
}
}Strengths:
🧪 Test Coverage & QualityComprehensive Test SuiteThe test coverage is exceptional with 615 new lines covering multiple scenarios:
High-Quality Test Design
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsEfficient Implementation
Analyzer Performance
🔒 Security ConsiderationsNo Security Concerns
🐛 Potential Issues FoundMinor: Missing XML DocumentationThe new logic block lacks XML documentation comments. Consider adding: /// <summary>
/// Checks if the method is IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync() which acts as a Test-level setup method
/// </summary>Edge Case: Interface InheritanceThe current implementation checks direct interfaces but might miss inherited interface implementations. However, this matches the existing pattern for 📋 Adherence to TUnit Guidelines✅ Follows All TUnit Rules
Code Style Compliance
🎯 RecommendationsImplementation: Ready to MergeThe code is production-ready and follows all TUnit guidelines. The implementation is:
Optional Enhancements
🏆 SummaryThis is an excellent PR that successfully extends the analyzer to handle Recommendation: ✅ Approve and merge |
…osableFieldPropertyAnalyzer
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job PR Review: feat(analyzer): add support for IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync method in DisposableFieldPropertyAnalyzerTodo List:
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis PR successfully extends the ✅ Code Quality & Best PracticesExcellent Implementation
Well-Structured LogicThe new // Check for IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync()
var isInitializeAsyncMethod = false;
if (methodSymbol is { Name: "InitializeAsync", Parameters.IsDefaultOrEmpty: true })
{
var asyncInitializer = context.Compilation.GetTypeByMetadataName("TUnit.Core.Interfaces.IAsyncInitializer");
if (asyncInitializer != null && methodSymbol.ContainingType.Interfaces.Any(x =>
SymbolEqualityComparer.Default.Equals(x, asyncInitializer)))
{
isInitializeAsyncMethod = true;
level = HookLevel.Test;
}
}Strengths:
🧪 Test Coverage & QualityComprehensive Test SuiteThe test coverage is exceptional with 592 new lines covering multiple scenarios:
High-Quality Test Design
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsEfficient Implementation
Analyzer Performance
🔒 Security ConsiderationsNo Security Concerns
🐛 Potential Issues FoundMinor: Missing XML DocumentationThe new logic block lacks XML documentation comments. Consider adding: /// <summary>
/// Checks if the method is IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync() which acts as a Test-level setup method
/// </summary>Edge Case: Interface InheritanceThe current implementation checks direct interfaces but might miss inherited interface implementations. However, this matches the existing pattern for 📋 Adherence to TUnit Guidelines✅ Follows All TUnit Rules
Code Style Compliance
🎯 RecommendationsImplementation: Ready to MergeThe code is production-ready and follows all TUnit guidelines. The implementation is:
Optional Enhancements
🏆 SummaryThis is an excellent PR that successfully extends the analyzer to handle Recommendation: ✅ Approve and merge |
… improve static modifier check
…posable object creation
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job PR Review: feat(analyzer): add support for IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync method in DisposableFieldPropertyAnalyzerTodo List:
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis PR successfully extends the ✅ Code Quality & Best PracticesExcellent Implementation
Well-Structured LogicThe new // Check for IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync()
var isInitializeAsyncMethod = false;
if (methodSymbol is { Name: "InitializeAsync", Parameters.IsDefaultOrEmpty: true })
{
var asyncInitializer = context.Compilation.GetTypeByMetadataName("TUnit.Core.Interfaces.IAsyncInitializer");
if (asyncInitializer != null && methodSymbol.ContainingType.Interfaces.Any(x =>
SymbolEqualityComparer.Default.Equals(x, asyncInitializer)))
{
isInitializeAsyncMethod = true;
level = HookLevel.Test;
}
}Strengths:
🧪 Test Coverage & QualityComprehensive Test SuiteThe test coverage is exceptional with 592 new lines covering multiple scenarios:
High-Quality Test Design
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsEfficient Implementation
Analyzer Performance
🔒 Security ConsiderationsNo Security Concerns
🐛 Potential Issues FoundMinor: Missing XML DocumentationThe new logic block lacks XML documentation comments. Consider adding: /// <summary>
/// Checks if the method is IAsyncInitializer.InitializeAsync() which acts as a Test-level setup method
/// </summary>Edge Case: Interface InheritanceThe current implementation checks direct interfaces but might miss inherited interface implementations. However, this matches the existing pattern for 📋 Adherence to TUnit Guidelines✅ Follows All TUnit Rules
Code Style Compliance
🎯 RecommendationsImplementation: Ready to MergeThe code is production-ready and follows all TUnit guidelines. The implementation is:
Optional Enhancements
🏆 SummaryThis is an excellent PR that successfully extends the analyzer to handle Recommendation: ✅ Approve and merge |
No description provided.