Skip to content

Conversation

@thomhurst
Copy link
Owner

@thomhurst thomhurst commented Nov 11, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
Polyfill nuget patch 9.0.1 -> 9.0.2

Release Notes

SimonCropp/Polyfill (Polyfill)

v9.0.2

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Claude Code is working…

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

View job run

@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job


PR Review: Polyfill Dependency Update v8.9.1 → v9.0.1

🔍 Code Review Summary

This PR completes a two-part Polyfill v9 migration (following PR #3791). The update appears safe and ready for merge.

Review Findings

Code Quality & Best Practices:

Compatibility Analysis:

  • No breaking changes detected - TUnit's usage patterns remain compatible
  • ✅ Critical APIs (Dictionary.TryAdd(), using Polyfills;) unchanged
  • ✅ Enhanced type isolation through embedded attributes (architectural improvement)

Security & Performance:

  • ✅ No security concerns identified
  • ✅ No performance impact expected - same API surface
  • ✅ Improved type isolation prevents assembly conflicts

Test Coverage:

📋 Technical Details

What Changed:

- <PackageVersion Include="Polyfill" Version="8.9.1" />
+ <PackageVersion Include="Polyfill" Version="9.0.1" />

TUnit's Polyfill Usage:

  • TUnit.Engine: Uses Polyfills namespace for TryAdd() methods (15+ occurrences)
  • Build system: Embedded polyfill types via PolyUseEmbeddedAttribute=true
  • Custom fallback: PolyfillExtensions.cs for ReplaceLineEndings

Key Architectural Benefit:
Enhanced type isolation - each project gets isolated polyfill types, preventing conflicts with InternalsVisibleTo usage.

🚀 Recommendation: APPROVE

This is a routine dependency update with low risk:

  • Part of coordinated migration (build config already updated)
  • Backward-compatible API surface
  • Follows TUnit's established patterns
  • Improves type isolation architecture

Suggested Actions:

  1. ✅ Merge when CI passes
  2. Monitor post-merge for any edge cases
  3. Consider updating documentation to mention v9 compatibility

@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job


PR Review: Polyfill Dependency Update v8.9.1 → v9.0.1

Todo List:

  • Read the changed file (Directory.Packages.props)
  • Analyze Polyfill usage throughout the codebase
  • Check for potential breaking changes in v9
  • Review code quality and best practices
  • Assess security and performance implications
  • Evaluate test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

🔍 Code Review Summary

This PR completes a two-part Polyfill v9 migration (following PR #3791). The update appears safe and ready for merge.

Review Findings

Code Quality & Best Practices:

Compatibility Analysis:

  • No breaking changes detected - TUnit's usage patterns remain compatible
  • ✅ Critical APIs (Dictionary.TryAdd(), using Polyfills;) unchanged
  • ✅ Enhanced type isolation through embedded attributes (architectural improvement)

Security & Performance:

  • ✅ No security concerns identified
  • ✅ No performance impact expected - same API surface
  • ✅ Improved type isolation prevents assembly conflicts

Test Coverage:

📋 Technical Details

What Changed:

- <PackageVersion Include="Polyfill" Version="8.9.1" />
+ <PackageVersion Include="Polyfill" Version="9.0.1" />

TUnit's Polyfill Usage:

  • TUnit.Engine: Uses Polyfills namespace for TryAdd() methods (15+ occurrences)
  • Build system: Embedded polyfill types via PolyUseEmbeddedAttribute=true
  • Custom fallback: PolyfillExtensions.cs for ReplaceLineEndings

Key Architectural Benefit:
Enhanced type isolation - each project gets isolated polyfill types, preventing conflicts with InternalsVisibleTo usage.

🚀 Recommendation: APPROVE

This is a routine dependency update with low risk:

  • Part of coordinated migration (build config already updated)
  • Backward-compatible API surface
  • Follows TUnit's established patterns
  • Improves type isolation architecture

Suggested Actions:

  1. ✅ Merge when CI passes
  2. Monitor post-merge for any edge cases
  3. Consider updating documentation to mention v9 compatibility

@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job


PR Review: Polyfill Dependency Update v8.9.1 → v9.0.1

Todo List:

  • Read the changed file (Directory.Packages.props)
  • Analyze Polyfill usage throughout the codebase
  • Check for potential breaking changes in v9
  • Review code quality and best practices
  • Assess security and performance implications
  • Evaluate test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

🔍 Code Review Summary

This PR completes a two-part Polyfill v9 migration (following PR #3791). The update appears safe and ready for merge.

Review Findings

Code Quality & Best Practices:

Compatibility Analysis:

  • No breaking changes detected - TUnit's usage patterns remain compatible
  • ✅ Critical APIs (Dictionary.TryAdd(), using Polyfills;) unchanged
  • ✅ Enhanced type isolation through embedded attributes (architectural improvement)

Security & Performance:

  • ✅ No security concerns identified
  • ✅ No performance impact expected - same API surface
  • ✅ Improved type isolation prevents assembly conflicts

Test Coverage:

📋 Technical Details

What Changed:

- <PackageVersion Include="Polyfill" Version="8.9.1" />
+ <PackageVersion Include="Polyfill" Version="9.0.1" />

TUnit's Polyfill Usage:

  • TUnit.Engine: Uses Polyfills namespace for TryAdd() methods (15+ occurrences)
  • Build system: Embedded polyfill types via PolyUseEmbeddedAttribute=true
  • Custom fallback: PolyfillExtensions.cs for ReplaceLineEndings

Key Architectural Benefit:
Enhanced type isolation - each project gets isolated polyfill types, preventing conflicts with InternalsVisibleTo usage.

🚀 Recommendation: APPROVE

This is a routine dependency update with low risk:

  • Part of coordinated migration (build config already updated)
  • Backward-compatible API surface
  • Follows TUnit's established patterns
  • Improves type isolation architecture

Suggested Actions:

  1. ✅ Merge when CI passes
  2. Monitor post-merge for any edge cases
  3. Consider updating documentation to mention v9 compatibility

@thomhurst thomhurst changed the title chore(deps): update dependency polyfill to v9 chore(deps): update dependency polyfill to v9 - autoclosed Nov 12, 2025
@thomhurst thomhurst closed this Nov 12, 2025
auto-merge was automatically disabled November 12, 2025 18:11

Pull request was closed

@thomhurst thomhurst deleted the renovate/polyfill-9.x branch November 12, 2025 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file PATCH renovate-bot

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants