-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 105
feat: implement After hooks execution on cancellation for tests and enhance hook tracking #3883
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job PR Review: After Hooks Execution on CancellationI've completed a comprehensive review of this PR that implements after hooks execution on cancellation (fixes #3882). Todo List:
|
| Category | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Dual-Mode Compliance | ❌ CRITICAL FAILURE | Source generator mode not implemented |
| Code Quality | ✅ Good | Well-designed, minor sync-over-async issue |
| Test Coverage | ✅ Excellent | Comprehensive integration and unit tests |
| Performance | ✅ Good | Efficient caching, appropriate async patterns |
| Security | ✅ No Concerns | No security issues identified |
| Resource Management | ✅ Properly Handled | Correct disposal in service provider |
🚫 Recommendation: CHANGES REQUIRED
This PR cannot be merged until the dual-mode requirement is satisfied. The implementation approach is solid, but the missing source generator support makes it incomplete per TUnit's mandatory requirements.
Next Steps:
- ✅ CRITICAL: Implement source generator support for cancellation registration
⚠️ Optional: Address sync-over-async patterns and standardize cancellation token usage- ✅ Required: Test both execution modes explicitly
- ✅ Required: Verify identical behavior between modes
The concept and reflection-mode implementation are well-executed, but dual-mode compliance is non-negotiable per CLAUDE.md Rule 1.
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job PR Review: After Hooks Execution on CancellationTodo List:
|
| Category | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Dual-Mode Compliance | ❌ CRITICAL FAILURE | Source generator mode not implemented |
| Code Quality | ✅ Good | Well-designed, minor sync-over-async issue |
| Test Coverage | ✅ Excellent | Comprehensive integration and unit tests |
| Performance | ✅ Good | Efficient caching, appropriate async patterns |
| Security | ✅ No Concerns | No security issues identified |
| Resource Management | ✅ Properly Handled | Correct disposal in service provider |
🚫 Recommendation: CHANGES REQUIRED
This PR cannot be merged until the dual-mode requirement is satisfied. The implementation approach is solid, but the missing source generator support makes it incomplete per TUnit's mandatory requirements.
Next Steps:
- ✅ CRITICAL: Implement source generator support for cancellation registration
⚠️ Optional: Address sync-over-async patterns and standardize cancellation token usage- ✅ Required: Test both execution modes explicitly
- ✅ Required: Verify identical behavior between modes
The concept and reflection-mode implementation are well-executed, but dual-mode compliance is non-negotiable per CLAUDE.md Rule 1.
Fixes #3882