Skip to content

Conversation

@niranjan-kurhade
Copy link
Contributor

@niranjan-kurhade niranjan-kurhade commented Oct 26, 2024

Solves #168

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated demo notebook link for easier access.
    • Minor formatting adjustments for improved readability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes modifications to the README.md file for the cognee project. The primary change is the update of the demo notebook link from cognee%20-%20Get%20Started.ipynb to cognee_demo.ipynb. Additionally, minor formatting adjustments were made, such as removing extra spaces and adding a new line before the Task definition in the "Create your own memory store" section. Overall, the document's structure and content remain largely unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Updated demo notebook link; minor formatting adjustments (removed spaces, added newline).

Possibly related PRs

  • Cog 382 refactor demo notebook #145: The changes in this PR also involve updating a demo notebook link in the README.md, similar to the main PR's update of the demo notebook link.
  • Cog 380 #146: This PR includes modifications to the README.md that enhance clarity and usability, which may relate to the overall documentation improvements seen in the main PR.
  • Update README.md #149: This PR focuses on enhancing the presentation of the README.md, which aligns with the formatting adjustments made in the main PR.
  • Update README.md #151: This PR restructures the README.md, including minor formatting changes, which is consistent with the adjustments made in the main PR.
  • Fixed Links README.md #153: This PR addresses issues in the README.md, including fixing links, which is relevant to the main PR's focus on updating documentation links.

🐇 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A link updated, making room.
Formatting fresh, a tidy sight,
The README shines, all feels right.
Hop along, let’s celebrate,
With each small change, we elevate! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 351355a and 1890f40.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@niranjan-kurhade niranjan-kurhade changed the title Fixed Broken Link Fixed Broken Link in Readme Oct 26, 2024
@Vasilije1990 Vasilije1990 merged commit 99f5052 into topoteretes:main Oct 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants