Skip to content

Conversation

@0xideas
Copy link
Contributor

@0xideas 0xideas commented Nov 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated the search method to use query_text instead of query for improved clarity in function calls.
  • Documentation

    • Revised documentation to reflect the updated parameter name in the search function, ensuring users are informed of the correct usage.
  • Examples

    • Adjusted example scripts to demonstrate the new parameter name for the search method, enhancing readability and maintainability.

@0xideas 0xideas self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve updating the parameter name for the search function from query to query_text across multiple files. This modification affects the way the function is called in both test and example scripts, ensuring consistency in parameter naming. The documentation has also been updated to reflect these changes, providing users with the correct syntax for invoking the search function.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
cognee/tests/test_code_generation.py Updated search function call from query to query_text.
docs/quickstart.md Modified documentation to change query to query_text in example code for search function call.
examples/python/dynamic_steps_example.py Changed search method call from dictionary format to keyword argument format using query_text.
examples/python/simple_example.py Updated search method call from query to query_text.

Possibly related PRs

  • Cog 380 #146: The changes in the README.md include updates to the usage of the search function, aligning with the parameter name change from query to query_text, which is directly related to the modifications made in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • dexters1

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A change was made today,
From query to query_text bright,
Our searches now feel just right!
Hopping through lines, we cheer with glee,
For clearer calls, oh what a spree! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a2fc61 and bb404f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/quickstart.md (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs/quickstart.md

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ced5385 and 7a2fc61.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • cognee/tests/test_code_generation.py (1 hunks)
  • docs/quickstart.md (1 hunks)
  • examples/python/dynamic_steps_example.py (1 hunks)
  • examples/python/simple_example.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
examples/python/simple_example.py (1)

30-30: LGTM! Parameter name updated correctly.

The change from query to query_text aligns with the PR objectives and maintains consistency across the codebase.

Let's verify the parameter name consistency across other example files:

✅ Verification successful

Parameter name change verified and consistent across example files

The verification confirms that:

  • No instances of the old query= parameter remain in the example files
  • The new query_text parameter is consistently used in both Python examples:
    • examples/python/simple_example.py
    • examples/python/dynamic_steps_example.py
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of the old 'query' parameter
# in example files and documentation

# Search for any remaining 'query=' parameter usage in example files
echo "Checking for old 'query=' parameter in example files..."
rg -l 'query=["\']' examples/

# Search for any remaining 'query=' parameter usage in documentation
echo "Checking for old 'query=' parameter in documentation..."
rg -l 'query=["\']' docs/

Length of output: 221


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for query parameter usage
# Search for 'query' in Python files within examples directory
echo "Searching for 'query' parameter in example files..."
rg -A 2 -B 2 'query[\s]*=' examples/

# Also search for the new parameter name for comparison
echo -e "\nSearching for 'query_text' parameter in example files..."
rg -A 2 -B 2 'query_text[\s]*=' examples/

# Check for any Python files in examples directory
echo -e "\nListing Python files in examples directory..."
fd '\.py$' examples/

Length of output: 1291

cognee/tests/test_code_generation.py (1)

29-29: LGTM! Parameter rename is consistent with PR objectives.

The change from query to query_text aligns with the PR's goal of standardizing parameter names across the codebase.

Let's verify that this change is consistent across all search function calls:

✅ Verification successful

Parameter rename is consistently applied across the codebase

The verification results show that all instances of the search function calls are using the new query_text parameter name consistently. No occurrences of the old query parameter were found in search calls, confirming the change has been applied uniformly across:

  • Test files (test_*.py)
  • Task implementations (query_graph_connections.py)
  • Notebook examples (cognee_demo.ipynb)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'query' parameter in search calls
# Expected: No instances of search calls using 'query=' should remain

# Search for any remaining instances of search calls with the old parameter name
rg -p "search\([^)]*query\s*=" 

# Search for updated instances to confirm the change pattern
rg -p "search\([^)]*query_text\s*="

Length of output: 2308

docs/quickstart.md (1)

62-62: LGTM! Parameter name updated correctly.

The parameter rename from 'query' to 'query_text' is consistent with the PR objective.

examples/python/dynamic_steps_example.py (1)

212-212: LGTM! Parameter rename implemented correctly.

The change from query to query_text is consistent with the PR objective and maintains the same functionality while improving parameter naming clarity.

@0xideas 0xideas merged commit 1dd07cd into main Nov 19, 2024
27 of 28 checks passed
@0xideas 0xideas deleted the fix/rename-remaining-query-to-query-text-kwargs branch November 19, 2024 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants