Skip to content

Conversation

@Vasilije1990
Copy link
Contributor

@Vasilije1990 Vasilije1990 commented Dec 18, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new configuration options for Langfuse integration.
    • Added monitoring capabilities to key methods for improved telemetry.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling and logging during pipeline execution.
  • Chores

    • Updated dependencies in the project configuration, including an upgrade to weaviate-client and the addition of httpx.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces monitoring capabilities using Langfuse across several components of the Cognee project. The changes include adding optional Langfuse configuration parameters to the base configuration, conditionally importing the observe decorator, and applying it to key methods in the OpenAI adapter and code graph pipeline. Additionally, the project's dependencies have been updated, with a version bump for weaviate-client and the addition of the httpx library.

Changes

File Change Summary
cognee/base_config.py Added three new optional configuration attributes for Langfuse: langfuse_public_key, langfuse_secret_key, and langfuse_host.
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py Added @observe decorator to run_pipeline function for telemetry tracking.
cognee/infrastructure/llm/openai/adapter.py Added @observe decorator to acreate_structured_output and create_structured_output methods. Reformatted constructor and other methods for consistency.
pyproject.toml Updated weaviate-client from 4.6.7 to 4.9.6, added httpx dependency (version 0.27.0).

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: improve API request and response models and docs #154: The changes in cognee/api/client.py involve the addition of new data transfer objects (DTOs) and modifications to API response models, which may relate to the enhanced telemetry monitoring introduced in the main PR's run_pipeline function, as both involve API interactions and data handling.
  • Feature/cog 920 implement mock summaryobject for codegraph #385: The introduction of the get_mock_summarized_code function in cognee/tasks/summarization/mock_summary.py could be related to the overall data processing and summarization context of the main PR, particularly if the run_pipeline function is involved in similar data extraction or summarization tasks.

Suggested reviewers

  • dexters1

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Telemetry Tale 🔍
With Langfuse's keen and watchful eye,
Our code now dances, metrics fly!
Tracking each method's gentle stride,
No secret performance shall hide.
Hop, hop, observability! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
cognee/base_config.py (1)

13-15: LGTM! Remember to document the new environment variables.

The Langfuse configuration is properly implemented using environment variables for sensitive credentials.

Consider adding these new environment variables to the project's documentation or README to help other developers set up monitoring.

cognee/infrastructure/llm/openai/adapter.py (1)

46-47: Standardize @observe decorator usage.

The decorator usage is inconsistent:

  • acreate_structured_output: @observe()
  • create_structured_output: @observe

Choose one style and apply it consistently.

Also applies to: 69-70

cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (1)

56-57: Consider consolidating monitoring approaches.

The function currently has two monitoring mechanisms:

  1. Langfuse monitoring via @observe
  2. Explicit send_telemetry calls

Consider consolidating these approaches to avoid duplicate monitoring overhead.

Would you like assistance in refactoring this to use a single monitoring approach?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c8115b and c448dfb.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (2 hunks)
  • cognee/base_config.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/infrastructure/llm/openai/adapter.py (6 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
cognee/infrastructure/llm/openai/adapter.py

43-43: Local variable base_config is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable base_config

(F841)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)

49-49: Verify breaking changes in weaviate-client upgrade

The version upgrade from 4.6.7 to 4.9.6 is significant. While it's an optional dependency, we should verify the changelog for any breaking changes.

✅ Verification successful

Version upgrade appears safe to proceed

After reviewing the changelog between versions 4.6.7 and 4.9.6, there are no breaking changes identified. The updates primarily include:

  • New features (multi-vector search, new embedding models support)
  • Bug fixes and improvements (connection handling, timeout configurations)
  • Documentation updates

The changes are backward compatible and the upgrade should be safe, especially since it's marked as an optional dependency.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check weaviate-client changelog and release notes
gh api repos/weaviate/weaviate-python-client/releases \
  --jq '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("v4.")) | {version: .tag_name, body: .body}' \
  | jq 'select(.version | contains("4.7") or contains("4.8") or contains("4.9"))'

Length of output: 15064

Comment on lines +43 to +45
base_config = get_base_config()


Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove unused variable.

The base_config variable is assigned but never used.

-        base_config = get_base_config()
-
-
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

43-43: Local variable base_config is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable base_config

(F841)

Comment on lines 22 to 23
if MonitoringTool.LANGFUSE:
from langfuse.decorators import observe
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Incorrect usage of MonitoringTool enum for conditional import

The current implementation checks the enum value MonitoringTool.LANGFUSE directly for conditional import, which will always evaluate to True since it's a valid enum member. Instead, this should compare against the configured monitoring tool from base_config.monitoring_tool, similar to how it's correctly used in generic_llm_api/adapter.py.

  • cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py: Replace if MonitoringTool.LANGFUSE: with if base_config.monitoring_tool == MonitoringTool.LANGFUSE:
  • cognee/infrastructure/llm/openai/adapter.py: Replace if MonitoringTool.LANGFUSE: with if base_config.monitoring_tool == MonitoringTool.LANGFUSE:
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify Langfuse import condition.

The condition if MonitoringTool.LANGFUSE: checks an enum value directly, which might not be the intended way to check if Langfuse monitoring is enabled.


Let me check how MonitoringTool is defined to better understand the enum implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check how MonitoringTool enum is used across the codebase
rg -A 2 "MonitoringTool\." --type py

Length of output: 1288


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find MonitoringTool enum definition
rg -A 5 "class MonitoringTool" --type py

Length of output: 357

Added langfuse as mandatory dependency, added poetry.lock file

Fix
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (2)

40-40: Move import statement to the top of the file

The summarize_code import should be moved to the top of the file with other imports to maintain consistency and follow Python's style guidelines.

from cognee.tasks.storage import add_data_points
+from cognee.tasks.summarization import summarize_code

from cognee.base_config import get_base_config
from cognee.shared.data_models import MonitoringTool

monitoring = get_base_config().monitoring_tool
if monitoring == MonitoringTool.LANGFUSE:
    from langfuse.decorators import observe

-from cognee.tasks.summarization import summarize_code
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

40-40: Module level import not at top of file

(E402)


74-74: Consider telemetry strategy in deprecated function

The function is marked as deprecated but new monitoring capabilities are being added. Additionally, there might be redundancy between Langfuse monitoring and existing send_telemetry calls.

Consider:

  1. Adding monitoring to the new run_code_graph_pipeline function instead
  2. Documenting the transition plan from send_telemetry to Langfuse
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2bb1c5 and 341b5fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py

40-40: Module level import not at top of file

(E402)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
cognee/api/v1/cognify/code_graph_pipeline.py (2)

33-38: LGTM: Correct implementation of monitoring configuration

The monitoring tool configuration is properly implemented using the base configuration and correct enum comparison.


36-38: Verify Langfuse configuration availability

Let's ensure that the necessary Langfuse configuration is properly defined in the base configuration.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the monitoring configuration to ensure it's properly set up.


Let me check one more thing to see if there's any Langfuse initialization or setup code elsewhere.


Langfuse configuration is properly set up

The verification shows that Langfuse is well-integrated in the codebase:

  • Configuration keys (public, secret, host) are properly defined in base_config.py
  • Langfuse is set as the default monitoring tool
  • The import is used consistently across multiple components (code_graph_pipeline, openai adapter, generic_llm_api)
  • Proper environment variable configuration is in place
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if Langfuse configuration is properly defined
rg -A 5 "langfuse_(public|secret|host)" --type py

Length of output: 621


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check MonitoringTool enum definition and its usage
rg -A 5 "class MonitoringTool" --type py

# Check if there's any initialization of Langfuse client
rg "Langfuse\(" --type py

Length of output: 385


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any Langfuse-related initialization or setup
rg -B 2 -A 5 "from langfuse" --type py

# Check if there's any other Langfuse configuration or setup
rg "langfuse" -i --type py

Length of output: 2966

@dexters1 dexters1 self-requested a review December 19, 2024 15:11
@Vasilije1990 Vasilije1990 merged commit 14cd1b1 into dev Dec 19, 2024
30 of 38 checks passed
@Vasilije1990 Vasilije1990 deleted the LANGFUSE_FIX branch December 19, 2024 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants