Remove orphaned filesystem reference.

[soobrosa]

Description

DCO Affirmation

I affirm that all code in every commit of this pull request conforms to the terms of the Topoteretes Developer Certificate of Origin.

[pull-checklist]

Please make sure all the checkboxes are checked:

• I have tested these changes locally.
• I have reviewed the code changes.
• I have added end-to-end and unit tests (if applicable).
• I have updated the documentation and README.md file (if necessary).
• I have removed unnecessary code and debug statements.
• PR title is clear and follows the convention.
• I have tagged reviewers or team members for feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The Dockerfile was updated to remove the "filesystem" extra from the POETRY_EXTRAS build argument. This change alters which Poetry extras are installed during the Docker image build process, specifically excluding the "filesystem" related dependencies. No other modifications were made to the Dockerfile or any other files.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
Dockerfile	Removed "filesystem" from the POETRY_EXTRAS build argument used for Poetry.

Possibly related PRs

• chore: Be explicit on extras to install in Docker #598: Also modifies the Dockerfile, specifically the POETRY_EXTRAS build argument, making it directly related.
• feat: follow extras in Docker #694: Changes the set of Poetry extras installed via the same build argument in the Dockerfile.

Suggested labels

run-checks

Suggested reviewers

• dexters1
• borisarzentar

Poem

A Dockerfile hops, a tweak in its stride,
"Filesystem" waved as it slipped to the side.
Extras are lighter, the build is more neat,
Poetry installs with a minimalist beat.
Rabbits approve, with a wiggle and cheer—
Clean containers ahead, the horizon is clear! 🐇

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

Dockerfile (1)

4-18: Consider refactoring the long extras list for maintainability
Embedding a long, whitespace‑separated string in a single ARG can get brittle as extras change. As an optional improvement, you might:

• Move extras into pyproject.toml under [tool.poetry.extras] and invoke poetry install --extras "$(poetry run poetry export -f json | jq -r '.metadata.extras | keys[]')" (or similar).
• Extract the list into a separate file and copy it into the build context, then read it via ARG or ENV.

This can make the Dockerfile cleaner and reduce the chance of typos when updating extras.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22f106c and 0a787db.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Dockerfile (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)

• GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Run Telemetry Test
• GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Run Telemetry Pipeline Test
• GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Server Start Test
• GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / S3 Bucket Test
• GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Deletion Test
• GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Deduplication Test
• GitHub Check: Basic Tests / Run Unit Tests
• GitHub Check: Basic Tests / Run Simple Examples
• GitHub Check: Basic Tests / Run Integration Tests
• GitHub Check: Basic Tests / Run Basic Graph Tests

🔇 Additional comments (1)

Dockerfile (1)

8-8: 💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Confirm safe removal of the filesystem extra
The filesystem extra was dropped from POETRY_EXTRAS. Please ensure no code, tests, or transitive dependencies still rely on it (for example, in pyproject.toml, import statements, or CI scripts).

You can run a quick grep to catch any lingering references:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify no code or configuration still expects 'filesystem'
rg -n "filesystem"

Length of output: 367

---

Remove filesystem extra from Helm Dockerfile
A lingering entry remains in helm/Dockerfile on line 6. The other grep hits (adapter.py docstring and render_prompt comment) are non‑code references and can be ignored.

• File: helm/Dockerfile, Line 6

• Remove filesystem from the extras list.

Diff:

- filesystem postgres weaviate qdrant neo4j falkordb milvus kuzu \
+ postgres weaviate qdrant neo4j falkordb milvus kuzu \

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.