Fix default user #908
Fix default user #908
Conversation
Please make sure all the checkboxes are checked:
|
WalkthroughThis update enhances the search functionality by adding new search types and a configurable search range in the frontend, and extends the backend API to accept and process a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Frontend
participant BackendAPI
participant SearchEngine
User->>Frontend: Selects search type and range, submits search
Frontend->>BackendAPI: POST /search (query_text, query_type, top_k)
BackendAPI->>SearchEngine: search(query_text, query_type, top_k, user)
SearchEngine-->>BackendAPI: Search results (limited by top_k)
BackendAPI-->>Frontend: Returns results
Frontend-->>User: Displays results
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
alembic/versions/482cd6517ce4_add_default_user.py (1)
26-29: Consider using contextlib.suppress for cleaner exception handling.The try-except logic correctly handles the case where the default user already exists, making the migration idempotent. However, you could make this more concise by following the static analysis suggestion.
Apply this diff to use
contextlib.suppress:+from contextlib import suppress + - try: - await_only(create_default_user()) - except UserAlreadyExists: - pass # It's fine if the default user already exists + with suppress(UserAlreadyExists): + await_only(create_default_user())🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
26-29: Use
contextlib.suppress(UserAlreadyExists)instead oftry-except-pass(SIM105)
cognee-frontend/src/ui/Partials/SearchView/SearchView.tsx (1)
161-170: Verify layout change impact on user experience.The form layout changed from horizontal to vertical stacking. Ensure this layout change doesn't negatively impact the user interface on different screen sizes.
Consider testing the new vertical layout across different viewport sizes to ensure responsive behavior is maintained.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
cognee-frontend/tsconfig.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
alembic/versions/482cd6517ce4_add_default_user.py(2 hunks)cognee-frontend/src/ui/Partials/SearchView/SearchView.tsx(6 hunks)cognee/api/v1/search/routers/get_search_router.py(3 hunks)entrypoint.sh(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
alembic/versions/482cd6517ce4_add_default_user.py (1)
cognee/modules/users/methods/create_default_user.py (1)
create_default_user(5-19)
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
alembic/versions/482cd6517ce4_add_default_user.py
26-29: Use contextlib.suppress(UserAlreadyExists) instead of try-except-pass
(SIM105)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (10)
- GitHub Check: Basic Tests / Run Basic Graph Tests
- GitHub Check: Basic Tests / Run Integration Tests
- GitHub Check: Basic Tests / Run Simple Examples
- GitHub Check: Basic Tests / Run Unit Tests
- GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / S3 Bucket Test
- GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Deletion Test
- GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Deduplication Test
- GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Run Telemetry Test
- GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Run Telemetry Pipeline Test
- GitHub Check: End-to-End Tests / Server Start Test
🔇 Additional comments (14)
alembic/versions/482cd6517ce4_add_default_user.py (1)
15-15: LGTM: Proper exception import for handling existing users.The import of
UserAlreadyExistscorrectly addresses the PR objective of handling cases where the default user already exists.entrypoint.sh (2)
45-45: Good cleanup: Trailing space removed.Removing the trailing space improves code cleanliness without affecting functionality.
17-17:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify that error detection still works without stderr capture.
Removing the stderr redirection (
2>&1) might prevent the error handling logic on lines 21-22 from detecting "UserAlreadyExists" exceptions if they're written to stderr instead of stdout.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if UserAlreadyExists exceptions are written to stdout or stderr cd cognee/modules/users/methods ast-grep --pattern 'raise UserAlreadyExists($_)'Length of output: 84
I couldn’t locate the error‐handling block in entrypoint.sh to confirm whether stderr is still captured. Could you please help verify that the “UserAlreadyExists” check in lines 21–22 still correctly inspects Alembic’s output after removing
2>&1? Specifically:#!/bin/bash # Show entrypoint.sh around the migration and error-handling logic fd entrypoint.sh | xargs sed -n '1,50p'This will let us confirm if error messages might now be missed.
cognee/api/v1/search/routers/get_search_router.py (4)
1-1: LGTM: Proper import for Optional type hint.The addition of
Optionalimport supports the new optionaltop_kparameter.
16-16: LGTM: Well-designed optional parameter with sensible default.The
top_kparameter with a default value of 10 provides a reasonable limit for search results while maintaining backward compatibility.
44-47: LGTM: Proper parameter passing to search function.The search function call correctly passes all required parameters including the new
top_kparameter.
16-47: Verify alignment with PR objectives.These search enhancement changes don't appear to relate to the stated PR objective of "Fix default user" for handling existing users in the UI.
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any references to user creation or management in the search module rg -A 3 -B 3 "default.*user|create.*user|UserAlreadyExists" --type pyLikely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
29-29: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
38-38: Do not perform function call
Dependsin argument defaults; instead, perform the call within the function, or read the default from a module-level singleton variable(B008)
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
[refactor] 22-22: Too few public methods (0/2)
(R0903)
cognee-frontend/src/ui/Partials/SearchView/SearchView.tsx (7)
6-6: LGTM: Proper import for Input component.The addition of
Inputto the imports supports the new numeric range input field.
36-42: LGTM: Well-named search options with clear descriptions.The new search types "Chain of Thought" and "Multi-Hop" have descriptive labels that clearly communicate their functionality to users.
44-44: LGTM: Appropriate default value for range input.The default value of 10 for
rangeValuealigns with the backend's defaulttop_kparameter.
100-100: LGTM: Proper integration with backend API.The
topKproperty in the request payload correctly maps to the backend'stop_kparameter.
119-119: LGTM: Proper dependency array update.Including
rangeValuein the dependency array ensures the search function updates when the range value changes.
133-135: LGTM: Proper event handling for numeric input.The
handleRangeValueChangefunction correctly parses the input value as an integer.
36-170: Question: Relationship to PR objectives unclear.These search functionality enhancements don't appear to relate to the stated PR objective of "Fix default user" for handling existing users in the UI.
Is this PR addressing multiple unrelated issues, or should the search enhancements be in a separate pull request?
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
Description
Resolve user already exist issue for UI
DCO Affirmation
I affirm that all code in every commit of this pull request conforms to the terms of the Topoteretes Developer Certificate of Origin.