Skip to content

Conversation

@arturtoshev
Copy link
Member

@arturtoshev arturtoshev commented Oct 14, 2025

  • Python from ">=3.9" to ">=3.10"
  • JAX from "==0.4.29" to ">=0.6.2"
  • Fix loading r0 properties

@arturtoshev arturtoshev changed the title Upgrade to jax==0.6.2 Upgrade to jax>=0.6.2 Oct 14, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 14, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 68.0%. Comparing base (4c6f978) to head (090bdea).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
jax_sph/defaults.py 0.0% 2 Missing ⚠️
jax_sph/case_setup.py 0.0% 1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (0.0%) is below the target coverage (50.0%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main     #21   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   68.0%   68.0%           
=====================================
  Files         11      11           
  Lines       1420    1420           
=====================================
  Hits         967     967           
  Misses       453     453           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 68.0% <0.0%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@arturtoshev
Copy link
Member Author

Using this JAX-SPH version in LagrangeBench might require some adjustments. But this is on the lagrangebench side.

@arturtoshev arturtoshev merged commit 808f874 into main Oct 29, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants