Skip to content

Conversation

JounQin
Copy link
Member

@JounQin JounQin commented May 26, 2025

Important

Adds flatConfigs as a property to the exported plugin object in index.ts, updating its structure and export statement.

  • Behavior:
    • Adds flatConfigs as a property to the exported plugin object in index.ts.
    • flatConfigs are created using createFlatConfig for various configurations like recommended, errors, warnings, etc.
  • Code Structure:
    • Renames plugin to plugin_ and then reassigns plugin to include flatConfigs.
    • Updates export statement to include flatConfigs and the modified plugin.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 9023bc7. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Simplified the way configuration options are attached and exported, making the structure clearer and more readable.
  • Chores

    • Improved type definitions to better reflect the exported structure and enhance type accuracy.

@JounQin JounQin requested a review from Copilot May 26, 2025 09:05
@JounQin JounQin self-assigned this May 26, 2025
@JounQin JounQin added bug Something isn't working types labels May 26, 2025
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the exported plugin object by introducing the additional property flatConfigs and ensuring it is typed accordingly.

  • Renames the inner plugin object to plugin_ to allow extending it with flatConfigs.
  • Creates a new plugin variable combining the original plugin_ with the flatConfigs property before exporting.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/index.ts:151

  • [nitpick] The temporary variable name 'plugin_' may benefit from a more descriptive naming or a brief comment explaining its role in creating the final plugin object with flatConfigs.
const plugin_ = {

src/index.ts:188

  • [nitpick] Consider directly constructing the final plugin object with the flatConfigs property inline to simplify the code instead of using a temporary assignment and type coercion.
plugin.flatConfigs = flatConfigs

Copy link

Walkthrough

This pull request modifies the export of the plugin object to include flatConfigs as a property. The change involves creating a new plugin_ object and then extending it with flatConfigs before exporting. This ensures that importX has flatConfigs as a property.

Changes

File Summary
src/index.ts Renamed plugin to plugin_, added flatConfigs to the plugin object, and updated the export statement to include flatConfigs.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 26, 2025

Walkthrough

This change updates the eslint-plugin-import-x package by refining the type definitions to explicitly include the flatConfigs property on the exported importX object. It also simplifies the export structure in the implementation, making the assignment of flatConfigs to the plugin object more direct and clear. No runtime logic is altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.changeset/soft-fishes-cover.md Documents the patch: updates type definitions to include flatConfigs on the exported object.
src/index.ts Refactors export: assigns flatConfigs directly to plugin and updates type assertions accordingly.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant PluginModule as plugin (module)
    participant flatConfigs as flatConfigs (config object)
    PluginModule->>flatConfigs: Assign flatConfigs to plugin.flatConfigs
    PluginModule->>Export: Export plugin with flatConfigs property
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • SukkaW

Poem

In the warren of code, a patch took flight,
Types aligned, making exports bright.
No logic changed, just clearer sight—
flatConfigs now sits just right.
The plugin hops with typing cheer,
As bunnies code without a fear! 🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

src/index.ts

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 9.27.0

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find module '/lib/index.js' imported from /eslint.config.js
at finalizeResolution (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:274:11)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:859:10)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:983:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:799:12)
at #cachedDefaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:723:25)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:706:38)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJobForImport (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:307:38)
at #link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:163:49)


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7dacbd and 2032ab4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .changeset/soft-fishes-cover.md (1 hunks)
  • src/index.ts (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (21)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 and ESLint 8.56 on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 and ESLint 9 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 and ESLint 8 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 and ESLint 9 on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 and ESLint 8 on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 and ESLint 9 on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 and ESLint 8 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 and ESLint 9 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 and ESLint 8.56 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 and ESLint 9 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 and ESLint 8.56 on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 and ESLint 9 on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 18 and ESLint 8.56 on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 20 and ESLint 9 on ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 24 and ESLint 8.56 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 and ESLint 8.56 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 and ESLint 8 on windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 and ESLint 9 on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Lint and Test with Node.js 22 and ESLint 8 on macos-latest
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.changeset/soft-fishes-cover.md (1)

1-6: LGTM! Changeset properly documents the type fix.

The changeset correctly identifies this as a patch-level change and accurately describes the fix for the flatConfigs property type definition.

src/index.ts (4)

151-158: Base plugin object declaration looks good.

The base plugin object plugin_ correctly includes all the core properties needed for the ESLint plugin functionality.


160-160: Type assertion correctly declares the expected shape.

The type assertion as typeof plugin_ & { flatConfigs: typeof flatConfigs } properly tells TypeScript that the final plugin object will include the flatConfigs property, even though it's not assigned until later. This is necessary for the circular dependency pattern used here.


188-188: Explicit property assignment is safe and correct.

The explicit assignment plugin.flatConfigs = flatConfigs is safe because:

  1. flatConfigs is fully initialized by this point (defined at lines 172-186)
  2. The object contains all required configurations
  3. This addresses the type safety issue mentioned in the PR objectives

This resolves the concern from the previous review about flatConfigs initialization - the object is definitively constructed before assignment.


190-190: Direct export completes the refactoring.

The direct export of plugin (instead of using Object.assign) makes the code more explicit and aligns with the type definitions. The exported object now correctly includes flatConfigs as a property.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 26, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9023bc7

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented May 26, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/eslint-plugin-import-x@348

commit: 2032ab4

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.27%. Comparing base (c7dacbd) to head (2032ab4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #348   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.27%   96.27%           
=======================================
  Files          92       92           
  Lines        4833     4835    +2     
  Branches     1801     1801           
=======================================
+ Hits         4653     4655    +2     
  Misses        179      179           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to 9023bc7 in 6 minutes and 41 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 33 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 4 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. src/index.ts:151
  • Draft comment:
    Consider renaming 'plugin_' to a more descriptive name (e.g. 'basePlugin') for clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
2. src/index.ts:160
  • Draft comment:
    Using a type assertion to extend with flatConfigs works, but reordering definitions to avoid forward referencing 'flatConfigs' might improve clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
3. src/index.ts:188
  • Draft comment:
    Assigning 'plugin.flatConfigs = flatConfigs' is fine; verify that the circular reference (createFlatConfig using plugin) doesn’t lead to initialization issues.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 33% <= threshold 50% None
4. src/index.ts:190
  • Draft comment:
    Exporting default 'plugin' now (instead of using Object.assign) improves clarity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_ZfKh87VPnOy955me

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00% (target: -1.00%) 100.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (c7dacbd) 3623 3471 95.80%
Head commit (2032ab4) 3625 (+2) 3473 (+2) 95.81% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#348) 3 3 100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

@JounQin JounQin merged commit f949929 into master May 26, 2025
134 of 162 checks passed
@JounQin JounQin deleted the fix/types branch May 26, 2025 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working types
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant